NEMA NU 2-2018 performance measurements of Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system
Abstract
Ziel/Aim We evaluated the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) total-body PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2018 standard for comparison with other PET/CT systems. The new PET/CT system builds on the technology of the SiPM-based Biograph Vision 600 (Siemens Healthineers) and has an axial field of view (AFOV) of 106 cm. This setup offers full coverage of a human torso together with a much higher imaging sensitivity. Methodik/Methods Spatial resolution was measured with a Na-22 point source. Scatter fraction, noise equivalent count rate (NECR), sensitivity, correction accuracies, CT co-registration accuracy, image quality and time-of flight (TOF) resolution were measured with F-18 sources. Two image quality measurements were performed with foreground to background ratios of 4 to 1 and 8 to 1, both with TOF and PSF reconstruction (TrueX TOF). Image reconstruction used a maximum ring difference (MRD) of 85. For all other measurements, MRDs of 85 and 322 were used. Ergebnisse/Results The radial, tangential and axial spatial resolutions were 3.3, 3.4 and 3.8 mm, as measured with MRD 85. Sensitivities in MRD 85 and MRD 322 modes were 83.4 cps/kBq and 176.0 cps/kBq, and the NECRs at peak were 1.641 kcps and 3.018 kcps, both at 28.3 kBq/ml. Scatter fraction at peak NECR was 36.5 % and 37.0 %, respectively. The TOF resolution was 225 ps for MRD 85 and 227 ps for MRD 322. Image contrast recovery was between 74.4 to 86.9 % for 4:1 and between 77.6 to 92.6 % for 8:1 contras…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent PET systems with extra-large axial FOV >25 cm have potential to substantially reduce required acquisition times.
“This becomes especially evident with recent PET systems with extra-large axial FOV of >25 cm and their potential to substantially reduce required acquisition times [47,149,150].”
From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [149]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
Rogasch, J. M. M., Hofheinz, F., van Heek, L., Voltin, C.-A., Boellaard, R., & Kobe, C. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020451 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Prenosil, G., Hentschel, M., Fürstner, M., Sari, H., & Rominger, A.
- Affiliations
- Inselspital Bern, Nuklearmedizin
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- Venue
- Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 60
- ISSN
- 0029-5566 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-6407
- OpenAlex
- W3161213375
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- PET/CT, spatial resolution, noise equivalent count rate, detector sensitivity, scatter fraction, time-of-flight resolution, image quality, contrast recovery, axial field of view
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review