Cited by 275Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and RehabilitationNoise Effects and Management

Psychoacoustic Measures of Tinnitus

Henry, James A., Meikle, Mary B.·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Abstract

This report reviews research from the 1930s to the present that has extended our understanding by investigating the characteristics of tinnitus that can be studied using psychoacoustic techniques. Studies of tinnitus masking and residual inhibition began in the 1970s, leading to the therapeutic use of tinnitus masking and a consequent increase in research devoted to tinnitus measurement. In 1981, the CIBA Foundation symposium on tinnitus advocated general adoption of four tinnitus measures: (1) pitch, (2) loudness, (3) maskability, and (4) residual inhibition. Since then, psychoacoustic research into all four topics has proliferated, yielding many valuable insights and controversies concerning the details of measurement techniques. A consensus has emerged that neither the loudness nor other psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus bear a consistent relation to the severity or perceived loudness of tinnitus. Nevertheless, quantification is needed in clinical trials of proposed treatments and in a variety of other types of tinnitus research. Standardization of techniques for specifying the acoustic parameters of tinnitus thus continues to be an important research goal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0042-1748040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 70 · Cited by 275

Authors
Henry, J. A., & Meikle, M. B.
Affiliations
Portland VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
Published
2000-03
Volume
11
Issue
03
Pages
138-155
ISSN
  • 1050-0545 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-3107
OpenAlex
W156886959
Cited by
275
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
tinnitus, psychoacoustic measures, tinnitus masking, residual inhibition, tinnitus pitch, tinnitus loudness, tinnitus severity
MeSH terms
Humans, Perceptual Masking, Pitch Perception, Psychoacoustics, Tinnitus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review