Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,011

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version)

Open access
Dietrich, Christoph, Bamber, Jeffrey, Berzigotti, Annalisa, Bota, Simona, Cantisani, Vito, Castera, Laurent, Cosgrove, David, Ferraioli, Giovanna, Friedrich-Rust, Mireen, Gilja, Odd, Goertz, Ruediger, Karlas, Thomas, de Knegt, Robert, de Ledinghen, Victor, Piscaglia, Fabio, Procopet, Bogdan, Saftoiu, Adrian, Sidhu, Paul, Sporea, Ioan, Thiele, Maja·2017·Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound

Abstract

We present here the first update of the 2013 EFSUMB (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of elastography, focused on the assessment of diffuse liver disease. The first part (long version) of these Guidelines and Recommendations deals with the basic principles of elastography and provides an update of how the technology has changed. The practical advantages and disadvantages associated with each of the techniques are described, and guidance is provided regarding optimization of scanning technique, image display, image interpretation, reporting of data and some of the known image artefacts. The second part provides clinical information about the practical use of elastography equipment and the interpretation of results in the assessment of diffuse liver disease and analyzes the main findings based on published studies, stressing the evidence from meta-analyses. The role of elastography in different etiologies of liver disease and in several clinical scenarios is also discussed. All of the recommendations are judged with regard to their evidence-based strength according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. This updated document is intended to act as a reference and to provide a practical guide for both beginners and advanced clinical users.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0043-103952

Cites

191 of 191 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 191 references

Cited by

See all 1,011

Metadata

Authors
Dietrich, C., Bamber, J., Berzigotti, A., Bota, S., Cantisani, V., Castera, L., Cosgrove, D., Ferraioli, G., Friedrich-Rust, M., Gilja, O., Goertz, R., Karlas, T., de Knegt, R., de Ledinghen, V., Piscaglia, F., Procopet, B., Saftoiu, A., Sidhu, P., Sporea, I., & Thiele, M.
Venue
Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound
Published
2017-04-13
Volume
38
Issue
04
Pages
e16-e47
ISSN
  • 0172-4614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8782
OpenAlex
W2606035304
Cited by
1,011
References
191
FWCI
71.57
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0043-103952
The paper
Dietrich, C., Bamber, J., Berzigotti, A., Bota, S., Cantisani, V., Castera, L., Cosgrove, D., Ferraioli, G., Friedrich-Rust, M., Gilja, O., Goertz, R., Karlas, T., de Knegt, R., de Ledinghen, V., Piscaglia, F., Procopet, B., Saftoiu, A., Sidhu, P., Sporea, I., & Thiele, M. (2017). EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103952

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.