Indikationen und Evidenz von international entwickelten Online-Coaches zur Intervention bei psychischen Erkrankungen – ein Meta-Review
Abstract
Zusammenfassung: Ziel der Studie Für welche psychischen Indikationen wurden international Online-Coaches entwickelt und welche Nutzenevidenz gibt es? Methodik Systematische Literaturrecherche, Meta-Review. Ergebnisse Die Wirksamkeit wurde für eine Vielzahl an Online-Coaches für psychische Indikationen belegt bei überwiegend akzeptabler und hoher Qualität. Schlussfolgerung Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert einen guten Überblick über international entwickelte Online-Coaches für psychische Indikationen. Online-Coaches stellen eine sinnvolle Ergänzung zur Behandlung und Prävention psychischer Erkrankungen dar.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Internet-based interventions for posttraumatic stress have proven to be effective.
“Thus, such interventions have proven to be effective [22].”
From HELP@APP: Development and evaluation of a self-help app for traumatized Syrian refugees in Germany- A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Stein, J., Röhr, S., Luck, T., Löbner, M., & Riedel-Heller, S.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Stein, Janine
- Venue
- Psychiatrische Praxis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2017-08-29
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 7-15
- ISSN
- 0303-4259 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0876
- OpenAlex
- W2752528977
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatrische Praxis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- digital mental health interventions, mental illness, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, insomnia, post-traumatic stress disorder, treatment support, prevention, intervention efficacy, methodological quality
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Counseling, Depressive Disorder, Germany, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
