Cited by 32Medical Coding and Health InformationData Quality and ManagementElectronic Health Records Systems

Data Quality in Health Care: Main Concepts and Assessment Methodologies

Mashoufi, Mehrnaz, Ayatollahi, Haleh, Khorasani-Zavareh, Davoud, Talebi Azad Boni, Tahere·2023·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Introduction In the health care environment, a huge volume of data is produced on a daily basis. However, the processes of collecting, storing, sharing, analyzing, and reporting health data usually face with numerous challenges that lead to producing incomplete, inaccurate, and untimely data. As a result, data quality issues have received more attention than before. Objective The purpose of this article is to provide an insight into the data quality definitions, dimensions, and assessment methodologies. Methods In this article, a scoping literature review approach was used to describe and summarize the main concepts related to data quality and data quality assessment methodologies. Search terms were selected to find the relevant articles published between January 1, 2012 and September 31, 2022. The retrieved articles were then reviewed and the results were reported narratively. Results In total, 23 papers were included in the study. According to the results, data quality dimensions were various and different methodologies were used to assess them. Most studies used quantitative methods to measure data quality dimensions either in paper-based or computer-based medical records. Only two studies investigated respondents' opinions about data quality. Conclusion In health care, high-quality data not only are important for patient care, but also are vital for improving quality of health care services and better decision making. Therefore, using technical and nontechnical solutions as well as constant assessment and supervision is suggested to improve data quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0043-1761500

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mashoufi, M., Ayatollahi, H., Khorasani-Zavareh, D., & Talebi Azad Boni, T.
Affiliations
  • Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author
Ayatollahi, Haleh
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
2023-01-30
Volume
62
Issue
01/02
Pages
005-018
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W4318574514
Cited by
32
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
data quality, health data, data quality dimensions, data quality assessment, health records, electronic health records, medical records, data accuracy, data completeness, health data management
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Delivery of Health Care, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review