Cited by 8Ovarian function and disordersHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Bridging the Information Gap in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Narrative Review with Systematic Approach

Open access
Tay, Chau Thien, Williams, Fleur, Mousa, Aya, Teede, Helena, Burgert, Tania S.·2023·Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrinopathy with wide-ranging implications for affected individuals. Literature has shown that patients with PCOS are dissatisfied with the health information provided to them and that healthcare professionals lack adequate knowledge. In this narrative review with systematic approach, we explored the unmet information needs in PCOS care for both patients and healthcare professionals. A comprehensive search of databases yielded 41 relevant studies, predominantly of observational and qualitative design. Adults and adolescents with PCOS desire wide ranging health information and express a keen desire for weight management guidance. Importantly, discussions surrounding weight should be addressed knowledgeably and without weight bias. Therefore, healthcare professionals should facilitate access to comprehensive evidence-based resources. Lack of information drives PCOS-related online searches. Referral to support groups that promote individual agency in the self-management aspects of PCOS can furthermore guide patient resource acquisition. Patients prefer guidance from professionals that understand the psychosocial complexity of PCOS and can empathize with experiences of stigmatization or even marginalization depending on the cultural context of the individual. The findings informed the 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline, recommending patient-centered communication, evidence-based information resources, and culturally sensitive approaches to optimize PCOS care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0043-1777086

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in care, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs.

    “Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals [11,12,13,14] are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in the care provided, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs [15,16,17,18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, Karabulut E, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syn- drome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2016;31(12):2841-2855
  2. Teede HJ, Tay CT, Laven J, et al; International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Hum Reprod 2023;38(09):1655-1679 3 Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long- term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004;19(01):41-47
  3. Teede H, Deeks A, Moran L. Polycystic ovary syndrome: a complex condition with psychological, reproductive and metabolic man- ifestations that impacts on health across the lifespan. BMC Med 2010;8:41
  4. Crete J, Adamshick P. Managing polycystic ovary syndrome: what our patients are telling us. J Holist Nurs 2011;29(04):256-266
  5. Gibson-Helm M, Dokras A, Karro H, Piltonen T, Teede HJ. Knowl- edge and practices regarding polycystic ovary syndrome among physicians in Europe, North America, and internationally: an online questionnaire-based study. Semin Reprod Med 2018;36 (01):19-27
  6. Piltonen TT, Ruokojärvi M, Karro H, et al. Awareness of polycystic ovary syndrome among obstetrician-gynecologists and endocri- nologists in Northern Europe. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0226074
  7. Chemerinski A, Cooney L, Shah D, Butts S, Gibson-Helm M, Dokras A. Knowledge of PCOS in physicians-in-training: identifying gaps and educational opportunities. Gynecol Endocrinol 2020;36(10): 854-859
  8. Gibson-Helm ME, Lucas IM, Boyle JA, Teede HJ. Women's expe- riences of polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis. Fam Pract 2014; 31(05):545-549
  9. Khan NN, Vincent A, Boyle JA, et al. Development of a question prompt list for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018;110(03):514-522
  10. Authier M, Normand C, Jego M, Gaborit B, Boubli L, Courbiere B. Qualitative study of self-reported experiences of infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome through on-line discussion forums. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2020;81(05):487-492
  11. Ee C, Smith C, Moran L, et al. "The whole package deal": experi- ences of overweight/obese women living with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Womens Health 2020;20(01):221
  12. Hillman SC, Bryce C, Caleyachetty R, Dale J. Women's experiences of diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: a mixed-methods study in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2020;70 (694):e322-e329
  13. Ismayilova M, Yaya S. What can be done to improve polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) healthcare? Insights from semi-struc- tured interviews with women in Canada. BMC Womens Health 2022;22(01):157
  14. Pirotta S, Joham AE, Moran LJ, Skouteris H, Lim SS. Implementa- tion of the polycystic ovary syndrome guidelines: a mixed meth- od study to inform the design and delivery of a lifestyle management program for women with polycystic ovary syn- drome. Nutr Diet 2021;78(05):476-486
  15. Pirotta S, Joham AJ, Moran LJ, Skouteris H, Lim SS. Implementation of evidence-based PCOS lifestyle management guidelines: per- ceived barriers and facilitators by consumers using the Theoreti- cal Domains Framework and COM-B Model. Patient Educ Couns 2021;104(08):2080-2088
  16. Trent ME, Rich M, Austin SB, Gordon CM. Fertility concerns and sexual behavior in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syn- drome: implications for quality of life. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2003;16(01):33-37
  17. Weiss TR, Bulmer SM. Young women's experiences living with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2011; 40(06):709-718
  18. Young CC, Rew L, Monge M. Transition to self-management among adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: parent and adoles- cent perspectives. J Pediatr Nurs 2019;47:85-91 35
  19. Peña AS, Teede H, Hewawasam E, Hull ML, Gibson-Helm M. Diagnosis experiences of adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: cross-sectional study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2022;96 (01):62-69 36
  20. Schweisberger CL, Hornberger L, Barral R, et al. Gender diversity in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Endo- crinol Metab 2022;35(11):1422-1428
  21. Boyle J, Hollands G, Beck S, et al. Process evaluation of a pilot evidence-based polycystic ovary syndrome clinic in the Torres Strait. Aust J Rural Health 2017;25(03):175-181
  22. Carron R, Kooienga S, Gilman-Kehrer E, Alvero R. Cultural expe- riences, patterns, and practices of American Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an ethnonursing study. J Transcult Nurs 2020;31(02):162-170
  23. Ning N, Balen A, Brezina PR, et al. How to recognize PCOS: results of a web-based survey at IVF-worldwide.com. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;26(05):500-505
  24. Dokras A, Saini S, Gibson-Helm M, Schulkin J, Cooney L, Teede H. Gaps in knowledge among physicians regarding diagnostic crite- ria and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2017;107(06):1380-1386.e1
  25. Yan D, Yan-Fang W, Shi-Yang Z, et al. Is polycystic ovary syndrome appropriately diagnosed by obstetricians and gynaecologists across China: a nationwide survey. J Ovarian Res 2021;14(01):25
  26. Copp T, Muscat DM, Hersch J, et al. Clinicians' perspectives on diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome in Australia: a qualitative study. Hum Reprod 2020;35(03):660-668
  27. Dutta D, Bhattacharya S, Khandelwal D, et al. Clinical practice patterns of polycystic ovary syndrome among doctors of different specialties-an Indian perspective. US Endocrinol 2020;16:74-79
  28. Asante A, Omurtag K, Stewart EA, Coddington CC. Screening for insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: views of physi- cian members of the American Society for Reproductive Medi- cine. J Reprod Med 2015;60(9-10):371-377
  29. Alzamil H, Aloraini K, AlAgeel R, et al. Disparity among endo- crinologists and gynaecologists in the diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2020;20(03): e323-e329
  30. Ma R, Zou Y, Wang W, et al. Obesity management in polycystic ovary syndrome: disparity in knowledge between obstetrician- gynecologists and reproductive endocrinologists in China. BMC Endocr Disord 2021;21(01):182
  31. Doll I, Doll R, Buhling KJ. Diagnosis and therapy of polycystic ovarian syndrome: results of a survey among German gynecol- ogists with a review on literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285 (03):689-697
  32. Carron R, Simon N, Gilman-Kehrer E, Boyle DK. Improving rural nurse practitioner knowledge about polycystic ovary syndrome through continuing education. J Contin Educ Nurs 2018;49(04): 164-170
  33. Arif N, Khawaja S, Iqbal Q. Awareness of polycystic ovarian disease: knowledge and presence of presenting symptoms. Pak J Med Health Sci 2020;14:627-630
  34. Moran LJ, Tan ZQ, Bayer S, Boyle JA, Robinson T, Lim SS. Perspec- tives of allied health professionals on implementation of the lifestyle polycystic ovary syndrome guidelines: a qualitative study. J Acad Nutr Diet 2022;122(07):1305-1316

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tay, C. T., Williams, F., Mousa, A., Teede, H., & Burgert, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Burgert, Tania S.
Venue
Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
Published
2023-03
Volume
41
Issue
01/02
Pages
012-019
ISSN
  • 1526-4564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-8004
OpenAlex
W4389357672
Cited by
8
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, patient information needs, health professionals' knowledge, patient-centered communication, weight bias, online health information seeking, support groups, self-management, cultural sensitivity, stigmatization, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Communication, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review