Cited by 13Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsCongenital heart defects research

Tetralogy of Fallot: Influence of Surgical Technique on Survival and Reoperation Rate∗

Boening, A., Scheewe, J., Paulsen, J., Regensburger, D., Kramer, H.-H., Hedderich, J., Cremer, J. T.·2001·The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Abstract

Background The influence of different surgical techniques in patients with Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) on long-term survival and reoperation rate is still a matter of controversy. Patients and methods The data of 266 patients (152 male, 114 female, mean body weight: 13.4 +/- 11.9 kg, mean age 4.1 +/- 6.0 years) with TOF, including 30 patients (11.2 %) with TOF/pulmonary atresia, were analyzed retrospectively. A palliative surgical procedure preceded definite correction between 1975 and 1999 in 46 patients (17.5 %). The surgical technique consisted of a transannular patch in 103 patients (40.1 %); in 133 patients (51.8 %), a non-transvalvular technique was used. In 33 patients (12.3 %), a conduit was implanted into the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). For surgical access to the cardiac defects, a transventricular approach was used in 138 patients, and a transatrial/trans-pulmonary approach in 26 patients. The mean follow-up time of all patients was 6.6 years. Results Kaplan-Meier survival for the entire group was 86.2 % at one year and remained stable at 85.6 % after 5 years. The 30-day mortality was 10.1 % (27 patients). Fatal risk factors were: previous cardiac surgery, preoperative oxygen saturation (SO(2)) Conclusions In our series of TOF patients operated over a period of 25 years, we were unable to assess an influence of the surgical technique used for definite correction on mortality or reoperation rate. Pulmonary atresia in patients with TOF is associated with a h…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2001-19013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boening, A., Scheewe, J., Paulsen, J., Regensburger, D., Kramer, H.-H., Hedderich, J., & Cremer, J. T.
Affiliations
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
Venue
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Published
2001-12
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
355-360
ISSN
  • 0171-6425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1902
OpenAlex
W1983745382
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
tetralogy of Fallot, surgical technique, long-term survival, reoperation rate, transannular patch, transventricular approach, transatrial approach, pulmonary atresia, palliative surgery, 30-day mortality, pediatric cardiac surgery, aortic cross-clamp time
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany, Heart Failure, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Infant, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Intraoperative Complications, Male, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Tetralogy of Fallot, Time, Time Factors, Ventricular Outflow Obstruction, Incidence, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review