The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hepatotoxicity of Commonly Used Drugs: Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Antihypertensives, Antidiabetic Agents, Anticonvulsants, Lipid-Lowering Agents, Psychotropic Drugs
Abstract
Hepatotoxic adverse drug reactions have contributed to the decline of many promising therapies, even among mainstream medication classes (bromfenac and troglitazone are recent examples). The spectrum of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related liver toxicity continues to expand, with reports in children, interactive toxicity in persons with hepatitis C, and recognition of the toxicity of both the preferential and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Of the antihypertensive agents, methyldopa is now rarely prescribed and adverse effects are reported infrequently, whereas cases of liver injury associated with the angiotensin receptor and converting enzyme inhibitors are increasingly reported. Of the antidiabetic agents, acarbose, gliclazide, metformin, and human insulin have been implicated in causing liver injury. To date, the newer thiazolidinediones do not appear to share the hepatotoxic potential of troglitazone, although a few reports of acute hepatitis have accrued. Although liver injury has been associated with the "statins," the frequency of such toxicity is lower than that of the background population and the value of biochemical monitoring remains unproved. Newer concepts in anticonvulsant hepatotoxicity have been the recognition of the reactive metabolite syndrome, delineation of the risk factors for valproic acid toxicity, the potential role of carnitine in preventing valproic acid hepatotoxicity, and the toxicity of second-line antiepileptic drugs. Liver injury associated with newer psychotropic agents, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, is also discussed. The focus of the review is the hepatotoxicity of commonly used drugs with particular reference to recent and novel reports of toxicity. Well-known causes of liver injury such as chlorpromazine, phenytoin, and methyldopa are not discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Gliclazide has signi fi cant hepatic metabolism.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [467]
In the citing paper
“Hepatotoxicity has also been reported for glibenclamide and is rarely seen with gliclazide.”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [467]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tacke, F., Horn, P., Wai-Sun Wong, V., Ratziu, V., Bugianesi, E., Francque, S., Zelber-Sagi, S., Valenti, L., Roden, M., Schick, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.031 · Cited by 2,210
Lee, W. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra021844 · Cited by 1,594
Andrade, R. J., Chalasani, N., Björnsson, E. S., Suzuki, A., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Watkins, P. B., Devarbhavi, H., Merz, M., Lucena, M. I., Kaplowitz, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0105-0 · Cited by 924
Squires, R. H., Shneider, B. L., Bucuvalas, J. C., Alonso, E. M., Sokol, R. J., Narkewicz, M. R., Dhawan, A. K., Rosenthal, P. J., Rodriguez‐Baez, N., Murray, K. F., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.051 · Cited by 866
Mechanism-Based Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 3A4 by Therapeutic Drugs
Zhou, S., Chan, S. Y., Goh, B. C., Chan, E., Duan, W., Huang, M., & McLeod, H. L. (2005) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200544030-00005 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Chitturi, S., & George, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Seminars in Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2002-05-16
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 169-184
- ISSN
- 0272-8087 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-8971
- OpenAlex
- W1996604226
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Seminars in Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- drug-induced liver injury, hepatotoxicity, adverse drug reactions, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, COX-2 inhibitors, antihypertensive drugs, angiotensin receptor blockers, ACE inhibitors, methyldopa, antidiabetic drugs, thiazolidinediones, troglitazone, statins, antiepileptic drugs, L-carnitine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, psychotropic drugs, hepatitis C
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Anticonvulsants, Antihypertensive Agents, Hypolipidemic Agents, Child, Cholestasis, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver, Psychotropic Drugs, Liver Failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review