Cited by 66Metabolism and Genetic DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionMitochondrial Function and Pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Effects of Oral Creatine Supplementation in a Patient with MELAS Phenotype and Associated Nephropathy

Barisic, N., Bernert, G., Ipsiroglu, O., Stromberger, C., Müller, T., Gruber, S., Prayer, D., Moser, E., Bittner, R. E., Stöckler-Ipsiroglu, S.·2002·Neuropediatrics

Abstract

An 18-year-old male patient with MELAS phenotype and 2 previous episodes of cerebral stroke, recurrent seizures and nephropathy, was treated with creatine monohydrate after the acute onset of psychomental regression and changing states of somnolence and aggressive and agitated behaviour. These symptoms disappeared completely after 4 weeks of treatment with creatine after which the patient regained all his previous mental abilites. Brain (white matter) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (chemical shift imaging) performed at 6 and 12 months of treatment showed lactic acid (Lac) accumulation and high creatine (Cr) levels in relation to choline-containing compounds (Cho). Urinary creatinine excretion as an indicator of the muscle and brain creatine pool increased upon short-term (12 days) high-dosage creatine supplementation (20 g per day) while plasma creatinine concentrations as possible indicators both of increasing creatine pool and of renal insufficiency increased during the course (28 months) of low-dosage creatine supplementation (5 g per day). Deterioration of renal function was finally indicated by urea retention and by impairment of renal creatinine clearance. These observations suggest that creatine supplementation may have a neuroprotective effect in patients with MELAS and episodes of acute mental deterioration. Adverse effects of creatine supplementation on renal function must be considered especially in patients with preexisting nephropathy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2002-33679

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 66

Metadata

Authors
Barisic, N., Bernert, G., Ipsiroglu, O., Stromberger, C., Müller, T., Gruber, S., Prayer, D., Moser, E., Bittner, R. E., & Stöckler-Ipsiroglu, S.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
Neuropediatrics
Published
2002-06
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
157-161
ISSN
  • 0174-304X (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1899
OpenAlex
W1998245058
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Keywords
MELAS, creatine monohydrate supplementation, kidney disease, renal function, neuroprotection, lactate accumulation, seizures, stroke, creatinine clearance
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Creatine, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Male, Phenotype, MELAS Syndrome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review