The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Effects of Oral Creatine Supplementation in a Patient with MELAS Phenotype and Associated Nephropathy
Abstract
An 18-year-old male patient with MELAS phenotype and 2 previous episodes of cerebral stroke, recurrent seizures and nephropathy, was treated with creatine monohydrate after the acute onset of psychomental regression and changing states of somnolence and aggressive and agitated behaviour. These symptoms disappeared completely after 4 weeks of treatment with creatine after which the patient regained all his previous mental abilites. Brain (white matter) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (chemical shift imaging) performed at 6 and 12 months of treatment showed lactic acid (Lac) accumulation and high creatine (Cr) levels in relation to choline-containing compounds (Cho). Urinary creatinine excretion as an indicator of the muscle and brain creatine pool increased upon short-term (12 days) high-dosage creatine supplementation (20 g per day) while plasma creatinine concentrations as possible indicators both of increasing creatine pool and of renal insufficiency increased during the course (28 months) of low-dosage creatine supplementation (5 g per day). Deterioration of renal function was finally indicated by urea retention and by impairment of renal creatinine clearance. These observations suggest that creatine supplementation may have a neuroprotective effect in patients with MELAS and episodes of acute mental deterioration. Adverse effects of creatine supplementation on renal function must be considered especially in patients with preexisting nephropathy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A few case studies reported that individuals purportedly taking creatine with or without other supplements presented with high creatinine levels and/or renal dysfunction.
“With regard to the question of whether creatine has effect on renal function, a few case studies [249–252] reported that individuals purportedly taking creatine with or without other supplements presented with high creatinine levels and/or renal dysfunction [249–251].”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine (2017) · cites this paper as [252]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Barisic, N., Bernert, G., Ipsiroglu, O., Stromberger, C., Müller, T., Gruber, S., Prayer, D., Moser, E., Bittner, R. E., & Stöckler-Ipsiroglu, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Venue
- Neuropediatrics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-161
- ISSN
- 0174-304X (ISSN-L)
- 1439-1899
- OpenAlex
- W1998245058
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Keywords
- MELAS, creatine monohydrate supplementation, kidney disease, renal function, neuroprotection, lactate accumulation, seizures, stroke, creatinine clearance
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Creatine, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Male, Phenotype, MELAS Syndrome, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review