The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach: Outcome Analysis of 100 Consecutive Procedures
Abstract
The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach has been proposed in the past decade as a minimally invasive surgical technique for the removal of pituitary tumors. From January 1997 to November 1999, 100 consecutive patients with pituitary tumors underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery, according to Jho's technique. We employed 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 70 degrees rigid endoscopes, 18 - 30 cm in length, 4 mm in diameter with an outer sleeve for irrigation and secured to a holder. Among the 87 pituitary adenomas, tumor removal was total in 51, subtotal (> 80 %) in 20 and partial in 16 cases. Four craniopharyngiomas were totally removed and an intra-suprasellar arachnoid cyst was emptied; a biopsy was performed in the two patients with a clivus chordoma. The two cases of sphenoid sinusitis were cured by surgery, the three patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea were successfully treated and the residual nasal meningocele was removed. The endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach appeared to be less traumatic than the traditional microsurgical approach, was very effective, and was characterized by a reduced number of complications. However, the relatively small series together with the short follow-up do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. The post-operative reduction in hospital stay (two days in 40 of 100), significantly reduced the cost of patient's management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Treatment of Cushing's Disease
Pivonello, R., De Leo, M., Cozzolino, A., & Colao, A. (2015) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2013-1048 · Cited by 465
Self-citationDehdashti, A. R., Ganna, A., Karabatsou, K., & Gentili, F. (2008) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000297072.75304.89 · Cited by 408
Berker, M., Hazer, D. B., Yücel, T., Gürlek, A., Cila, A., Aldur, M., & Önerci, M. (2012) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-011-0368-2 · Cited by 282
Alobid, I., Enseñat, J., Mariño-Sánchez, F., Rioja, E., de Notaris, M., Mullol, J., & Bernal-Sprekelsen, M. (2013) · American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy · doi:10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3932 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Cappabianca, P., Cavallo, L. M., Colao, A., Del Basso De Caro, M., Esposito, F., Cirillo, S., Lombardi, G., & de Divitiis, E.
- Venue
- min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0946-7211 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-2291
- OpenAlex
- W2062933920
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach: Outcome Analysis of 100 Consecutive Procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2002-36197
- The paper
- Cappabianca, P., Cavallo, L. M., Colao, A., Del Basso De Caro, M., Esposito, F., Cirillo, S., Lombardi, G., & de Divitiis, E. (2002). Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach: Outcome Analysis of 100 Consecutive Procedures. min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-36197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.