Cited by 25Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingBiochemical effects in animals

Effects of Oral Creatine-Pyruvate Supplementation in Cycling Performance

Van Schuylenbergh, R., Van Leemputte, M., Hespel, P.·2003·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

A double-blind study was performed to evaluate the effects of oral creatine-pyruvate administration on exercise performance in well-trained cyclists. Endurance and intermittent sprint performance were evaluated before (pretest) and after (posttest) one week of creatine-pyruvate intake (Cr(pyr), 2 x 3.5 g x d-1, n = 7) or placebo (PL, n = 7). Subjects first performed a 1-hour time trial during which the workload could be adjusted at 5-min intervals. Immediately they did five 10-sec sprints interspersed by 2-min rest intervals. Tests were performed on an individual race bicycle that was mounted on an ergometer. Steady-state power production on average was about 235-245 W, which corresponded to blood lactate concentrations of 4-5 mmol x l -1 and heart rate in the range of 160-170 beats x min -1. Power outputs as well as blood lactate levels and heart rates were similar between Cr(pyr) and PL at all times. Total work performed during the 1-h trial was 872 +/- 44 KJ in PL versus 891 +/- 51 KJ in CR pyr. During the intermittent sprint test power peaked at about 800-1000 watt within 2-3 sec, decreasing by 15-20 % towards the end of each sprint. Peak and mean power outputs were similar between groups at all times. Peak lactate concentrations after the final sprint were approximately 11 mmol x l -1 in both groups during both the pretest and the posttest. It is concluded that one week of creatine-pyruvate supplementation at a rate of 7 g x d -1 does not beneficially impact on either en…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2003-38400

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 7 days of 7 g per day CPY supplementation did not beneficially impact endurance capacity or intermittent sprint performance in well-trained cyclists.

    “In this regard, 7 days of 7 g per day CPY supplementation did not beneficially impact endurance capacity or intermittent sprint performance in well-trained cyclists (Van Schuylenbergh et al. 2003), whereas 5 days of 7.5 g per day CPY intake increased paddling speed and resulted in decreased lactate concentrations in Olympic canoeists, suggesting an increase in aerobic metabolism (Nuuttilla 2000).”

    From Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and regulatory status of novel forms of creatine (2011) · cites this paper as Van Schuylenbergh et al. 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Schuylenbergh, R., Van Leemputte, M., & Hespel, P.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2003
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
144-150
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W1981666036
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
Keywords
dietary supplementation, cycling performance, endurance capacity, blood lactate, output power, trained cyclists
MeSH terms
Bicycling, Creatine, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Pyruvic Acid, Lactic Acid, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review