CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106Medical Practices and RehabilitationRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der subjektiven Prognose der Erwerbstätigkeit: Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung an 4279 Mitgliedern der gesetzlichen Arbeiterrentenversicherung zu Reliabilität (Guttman-Skalierung) und Validität der Skala

Oskar Mittag, Hans-Heinrich Raspe·2003·Die Rehabilitation
DOI 10.1055/s-2003-40095
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The psychometric properties of a 3-item scale for the assessment of subjective vocational disability were tested in 4279 blue-collar workers. Internal consistency of the scale was estimated by Guttman scaling. To evaluate construct validity the scale was compared to other measures of vocational ability, functional capacity, comorbidity, psychic status, and indicators of occupational handicap. The results are highly satisfactory, and the scale can be recommended for further use in rehabilitation research. Ongoing research is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2003-40095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 106

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mittag, O., & Raspe, H.-H.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Venue
Die Rehabilitation
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Published
2003-06
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
169-174
ISSN
  • 0034-3536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-1309
DOI
10.1055/s-2003-40095
OpenAlex
W2465347683
Cited by
106
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Die Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
short scale development, scale reliability, construct validity, blue-collar workers, functional capacity, comorbidities, rehabilitation research
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Eligibility Determination, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Prognosis, Self-Assessment, Sick Role, Social Security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review