The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological variation in variables associated with exercise training.
Abstract
To be able to identify a training induced change in a certain variable, it is necessary to know the background variation. In this study the coefficient of variation (total, between-subjects, within-subjects), the relative sources of variance (between-subjects and within-subjects), and the critical difference (within-subjects) were estimated in four categories of variables (performance and physiological variables, metabolic and hormonal variables, immunological variables, and mood state variables) in 15 moderately trained male runners measured on three different occasions over a period of 7 weeks. In the performance and physiological variables, 78.9 % of the variance was due to variation between subjects and they had the lowest critical difference (11.9 %). In contrast, the metabolic and hormonal variables had the highest critical difference (59.9 %) and 53.4 % of the variance was due to variations within subjects. The immunological and psychological variables had about two thirds of the variance arising from variation between subjects. However, the critical difference for the immunological variables was high (47.4 %), while it was relatively low for the psychological variables (26.8 %). The low critical difference and variation within subjects of the psychological and in particular the performance and physiological variables indicate that they may be beneficial as primary markers of training induced changes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, growing evidence shows that the same physical exercises induce very heterogeneous outcomes across individuals.”
From Dose-Response Matters! - A Perspective on the Exercise Prescription in Exercise-Cognition Research (2019) · cites this paper as Bagger et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Zakrzewski-Fruer, J. K. (2012) · Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagger, M., Petersen, P. H., & Pedersen, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Venue
- International Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-440
- ISSN
- 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-3964
- OpenAlex
- W134057725
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
- Keywords
- biological variation, coefficient of variation, critical difference, exercise training, training-induced changes, running performance, physiological parameters, mood states
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Hormones, Humans, Immune System, Male, Running, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review