Leistet die Magnetization-Transfer-Ratio (MTR) einen Beitrag zur Diagnostik und Differenzialdiagnostik der Demenzen?
Abstract
Purpose The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) is a MR-based neuroimaging procedure aiming at the quantification of the structural integrity of brain tissue. Its contribution to the differential diagnosis of dementias was examined and discussed in relation to the pathogenesis of age-related dementias. Materials and methods Sixty-one patients from a memory clinic were diagnosed by general physical and neuropsychiatric examination, and underwent neuropsychologic testing and neuroimaging using MRI. Their clinical diagnoses were based on standard operational research criteria. Additionally, the MTR in 10 defined regions of interest (ROI) was determined. This investigation was performed using a T1-weighted SE sequence. Average MTR values were determined in the individual ROI and their combinations and correlated with the age, gender, cognitive impairment and clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were determined, as well as the rate of correct classifications. Results For cognitive healthy subjects, the MRT values correlate only mildly, though significantly, with age in the hippocampus and with gender in the dorsal corpus callosum. In contrast, the MTR in the frontal white matter correlates strongly and highly significantly with cognitive impairment in patients with dementia. The differential diagnostic assignment of Alzheimer's disease versus vascular dementia by MTR provides a correct classification of approximately 50 % to 70 %. PPV…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Magnetisation transfer ratio has been studied in clinical Alzheimer's disease.
“Magnetisation transfer ratio has been studied in clinical Alzheimer's disease (Hentschel et al., 2004, van Es et al., 2006).”
From In vivo imaging of tau pathology using multi-parametric quantitative MRI (2015) · cites this paper as Hentschel et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In vivo imaging of tau pathology using multi-parametric quantitative MRI
Wells, J. A., O'Callaghan, J. M., Holmes, H. E., Powell, N. M., Johnson, R. A., Siow, B., Torrealdea, F., Ismail, O., Walker-Samuel, S., Golay, X., et al. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.023 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hentschel, F., Kreis, M., Damian, M., & Krumm, B.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- ORCID
- Hentschel, F
- Venue
- RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1743-1749
- ISSN
- 1438-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1438-9029
- OpenAlex
- W2090581690
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- magnetization transfer ratio, dementia, differential diagnosis, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, age-related dementia, cognitive impairment, white matter, hippocampus, corpus callosum, diagnostic accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Dementia, Vascular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review