Cited by 4Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Leistet die Magnetization-Transfer-Ratio (MTR) einen Beitrag zur Diagnostik und Differenzialdiagnostik der Demenzen?

Hentschel, F, Kreis, M, Damian, M, Krumm, B·2004·RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren

Abstract

Purpose The magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) is a MR-based neuroimaging procedure aiming at the quantification of the structural integrity of brain tissue. Its contribution to the differential diagnosis of dementias was examined and discussed in relation to the pathogenesis of age-related dementias. Materials and methods Sixty-one patients from a memory clinic were diagnosed by general physical and neuropsychiatric examination, and underwent neuropsychologic testing and neuroimaging using MRI. Their clinical diagnoses were based on standard operational research criteria. Additionally, the MTR in 10 defined regions of interest (ROI) was determined. This investigation was performed using a T1-weighted SE sequence. Average MTR values were determined in the individual ROI and their combinations and correlated with the age, gender, cognitive impairment and clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were determined, as well as the rate of correct classifications. Results For cognitive healthy subjects, the MRT values correlate only mildly, though significantly, with age in the hippocampus and with gender in the dorsal corpus callosum. In contrast, the MTR in the frontal white matter correlates strongly and highly significantly with cognitive impairment in patients with dementia. The differential diagnostic assignment of Alzheimer's disease versus vascular dementia by MTR provides a correct classification of approximately 50 % to 70 %. PPV…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2004-813650

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Magnetisation transfer ratio has been studied in clinical Alzheimer's disease.

    “Magnetisation transfer ratio has been studied in clinical Alzheimer's disease (Hentschel et al., 2004, van Es et al., 2006).”

    From In vivo imaging of tau pathology using multi-parametric quantitative MRI (2015) · cites this paper as Hentschel et al., 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hentschel, F., Kreis, M., Damian, M., & Krumm, B.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
Published
2004-12
Volume
176
Issue
12
Pages
1743-1749
ISSN
  • 1438-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-9029
OpenAlex
W2090581690
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
magnetization transfer ratio, dementia, differential diagnosis, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, age-related dementia, cognitive impairment, white matter, hippocampus, corpus callosum, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Dementia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Dementia, Vascular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review