Cited by 64Muscle metabolism and nutritionBiochemical effects in animalsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Few Adverse Effects of Long-Term Creatine Supplementation in a Placebo-Controlled Trial

Groeneveld, G. J., Beijer, C., Veldink, J. H., Kalmijn, S., Wokke, J. H. J., van den Berg, L. H.·2005·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Although oral creatine supplementation is very popular among athletes, no prospective placebo-controlled studies on the adverse effects of long-term supplementation have yet been conducted. We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of creatine monohydrate in patients with the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, because of the neuroprotective effects it was shown to have in animal experiments. The purpose of this paper is to compare the adverse effects, and to describe the effects on indirect markers of renal function of long-term creatine supplementation. 175 subjects (age = 57.7 +/- 11.1 y) were randomly assigned to receive creatine monohydrate 10 g daily or placebo during an average period of 310 days. After one month, two months and from then on every fourth month, adverse effects were scored using dichotomous questionnaires, plasma urea concentrations were measured, and urinary creatine and albumin concentrations were determined. No significant differences in the occurrence at any time of adverse effects due to creatine supplementation were found (23 % nausea in the creatine group, vs. 24 % in the placebo group, 19 % gastro-intestinal discomfort in the creatine group, vs. 18 % in the placebo group, 35 % diarrhoea in the creatine group, vs. 24 % in the placebo group). After two months of treatment, oedematous limbs were seen more often in subjects using creatine, probably due to water retention. Severe diarrhoea (n = 2) and severe nausea (n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2004-817917

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 64

Authors
Groeneveld, G. J., Beijer, C., Veldink, J. H., Kalmijn, S., Wokke, J. H. J., & van den Berg, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Rijnland Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2005-05
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
307-313
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2036609824
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
creatine monohydrate, long-term supplementation, adverse effects, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, renal function, serum urea, urinary albumin, microalbuminuria, water retention, diarrhea, nausea, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Albuminuria, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Creatine, Creatinine, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Time, Urea, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review