High Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Low Treatment Rates in Elderly Primary Care Patients with Diabetes
Abstract
Representative data on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in community-based office practice are scarce while at the same time of high interest. Thus, we aimed to determine the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), comorbidity of atherothrombotic manifestations, and treatment intensity among elderly diabetic patients in primary care. In this monitored cross-sectional study, 344 general practitioners throughout Germany determined the ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 6880 consecutive, unselected patients aged 65 years or older with bilateral Doppler ultrasound measurements. PAD was defined according to the recent American Heart Association guidelines (using the higher of the 2 systolic ankle pressures: ABI or = 6.5 % and/or intake of oral antidiabetic medication and/or application of insulin. 1.743 patients were classified as diabetics: the median disease duration was 6 years (1st; 3rd quartile: 2; 11), median HbA1c 6.6 % (5.9; 7.3), mean age 72.5 +/- 5.4 years, and 51.4 % were females. Diabetics had in comparison with non-diabetics a higher prevalence of PAD defined as ABI < 0.9 (26.3 % vs. 15.3 %, univariate odds ratio 2.0 [95 % confidence interval: 1.7; 2.3]), intermittent claudication (5.1 % vs. 2.1 %, OR: 2.5 [1.9; 3.4]), known CAD (16.1 % vs. 10.6 %, OR: 1.6 [1.4; 1.9]), and known CVD (6.8 % vs. 4.8 %; OR: 1.4 [1.2; 1.8]). 57.4 % of the diabetics with previously known PAD (as only atherothrombotic manifestation) received antiplatelet therapy (vs. 75.1 % with CAD an…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In other screening studies, 26% of people with diabetes have been shown to have PAD.
“Similarly, in other screening studies, 26% of people with diabetes have been shown to have PAD (234), and diabetes increased”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [234]
In other screening studies, 26% of people with diabetes have been shown to have PAD, and diabetes increased the odds of having PAD by 85%.
“Similarly, in other screening studies, 26% of people with diabetes have been shown to have PAD (224), and diabetes increased the odds of having PAD by 85% (225).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [224]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Das, S. R., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s010 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China
Weng, J., Ji, L., Jia, W., Lu, J., Zhou, Z., Zou, D., Zhu, D., Chen, L., Chen, L., Guo, L., et al. (2016) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2827 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, M., McCoy, R. G., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Bellini, N. J., Bennett, A. K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., ChallaSivaKanaka, S., et al. (2026) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc26-s010 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Predictive value of abnormal ankle-brachial index in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis
Nie, F., He, J., Cao, H., & Hu, X. (2021) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108723 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lange, S., Diehm, C., Darius, H., Haberl, R., Allenberg, J., Pittrow, D., Schuster, A., von Stritzky, B., Tepohl, G., & Trampisch, H.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- München Klinik (DE)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Venue
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2004-12-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 566-573
- ISSN
- 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-3646
- OpenAlex
- W2083291499
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, elderly patients, ankle-brachial index, intermittent claudication, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, antiplatelet therapy, primary care, prevalence, screening, treatment rates, comorbidities, Doppler ultrasound, HbA1c, amputation, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Systole, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Peripheral Vascular Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review