Reasons for Switching Between Antipsychotics in Daily Clinical Practice
Open accessAbstract
Background Previous research that atypical antipsychotics were switched less often compared to typical antipsychotics, suggesting overall better treatment satisfaction. The objective of this study was to investigate the reasons for switching antipsychotics after initiating oral treatment with either typical or atypical antipsychotics in a clinical setting. Patients and methods A total of 123 patients that switched antipsychotic therapy were recruited from 17 psychiatric hospitals, of which 46 % switched because of lack of effect and 45 % because of adverse effects. Results No significant differences were found between users of atypical versus typical antipsychotics in reasons for switching, both for overall adverse events, and lack of effect. In users of atypical antipsychotics extrapyramidal effects were reported less often as reason for switching (adjusted OR = 0.18 (95 % CI = (0.07 - 0.51)). Patients on atypical antipsychotics switched more often because of weight gain (adjusted OR = 12.8 (95 % CI = (1.50 - 109)). Conclusion In conclusion, when switching occurred, no difference was found in the frequency of general tolerability or reported lack of effectiveness. However, the type of adverse event as a reason for switching differed between atypical and typical antipsychotics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weight gain is a common reason for antipsychotic discontinuation.
“Weight gain is a major adverse effect of second-generation antipsychotics, affecting quality of life (4), personal recovery, and somatic morbidity and is a common reason for antipsychotic discontinuation (5).”
From Reversibility of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reversibility of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Speyer, H., Westergaard, C., Albert, N., Karlsen, M., Stürup, A. E., Nordentoft, M., & Krogh, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.577919 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hugenholtz, G. W., Heerdink, E. R., Meijer, W. E., Stolker, J.-J., Egberts, A. C., & Nolen, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Altrecht GGZ (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- ORCID
- Heerdink, E. R.
- Venue
- Pharmacopsychiatry
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 122-124
- ISSN
- 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0795
- OpenAlex
- W2118451905
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Pharmacopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- antipsychotic switching, atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, treatment non-response, adverse drug reactions, extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, tolerability, schizophrenia, psychiatric inpatients
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Antipsychotic Agents, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review