Cited by 32Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Reasons for Switching Between Antipsychotics in Daily Clinical Practice

Open access
Hugenholtz, G. W., Heerdink, E. R., Meijer, W. E., Stolker, J.-J., Egberts, A. C., Nolen, W. A.·2005·Pharmacopsychiatry

Abstract

Background Previous research that atypical antipsychotics were switched less often compared to typical antipsychotics, suggesting overall better treatment satisfaction. The objective of this study was to investigate the reasons for switching antipsychotics after initiating oral treatment with either typical or atypical antipsychotics in a clinical setting. Patients and methods A total of 123 patients that switched antipsychotic therapy were recruited from 17 psychiatric hospitals, of which 46 % switched because of lack of effect and 45 % because of adverse effects. Results No significant differences were found between users of atypical versus typical antipsychotics in reasons for switching, both for overall adverse events, and lack of effect. In users of atypical antipsychotics extrapyramidal effects were reported less often as reason for switching (adjusted OR = 0.18 (95 % CI = (0.07 - 0.51)). Patients on atypical antipsychotics switched more often because of weight gain (adjusted OR = 12.8 (95 % CI = (1.50 - 109)). Conclusion In conclusion, when switching occurred, no difference was found in the frequency of general tolerability or reported lack of effectiveness. However, the type of adverse event as a reason for switching differed between atypical and typical antipsychotics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2005-864122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight gain is a common reason for antipsychotic discontinuation.

    “Weight gain is a major adverse effect of second-generation antipsychotics, affecting quality of life (4), personal recovery, and somatic morbidity and is a common reason for antipsychotic discontinuation (5).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hugenholtz, G. W., Heerdink, E. R., Meijer, W. E., Stolker, J.-J., Egberts, A. C., & Nolen, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Altrecht GGZ (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Pharmacopsychiatry
Published
2005-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
122-124
ISSN
  • 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0795
OpenAlex
W2118451905
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Pharmacopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
antipsychotic switching, atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, treatment non-response, adverse drug reactions, extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, tolerability, schizophrenia, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Antipsychotic Agents, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review