Die Inzidenz von Zwangsmaßnahmen als Qualitätsindikator in psychiatrischen Kliniken. Probleme der Datenerfassung und -verarbeitung und erste Ergebnisse
Abstract
Objective The clinical practice concerning the use of coercive measures in psychiatry should be compared. Method A common documentation of physical restraint, seclusion, and medication by coercion was introduced among 10 hospitals. Results 8.4 % of cases treated within the first 6 months of 2004 were exposed to coercive measures with the highest percentage among patients with psychoorganic disorders (32.1 %). The incidence of coercive measures varied highly between different diagnostic groups and hospitals. Discussion The processing of the large multi-site data sets yields considerable technical problems. Data interpretation should consider confounding factors such as case mix and hospital structure characteristics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Die Inzidenz von Zwangsmaßnahmen stellt einen Qualitätsindikator für psychiatrische Kliniken dar.
“Nach Untersuchungen von Martin et al. (2007) stellt die Inzidenz von Zwangsmaßnahmen sogar einen Qualitätsindikator für psychiatrische Kliniken dar.”
From Burg Lino – Ein innenarchitektonisches Konzept zur Verbesserung der stationären Behandlung in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie (2019) · cites this paper as Martin et al. (2007)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review
Chieze, M., Hurst, S., Kaiser, S., & Sentissi, O. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Wöckel, L., Rung, D., Bachmann, S., Dietschi, H., & Wild, D. (2019) · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1422-4917/a000641 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Martin, V., Kuster, W., Baur, M., Bohnet, U., Hermelink, G., Knopp, M., Kronstorfer, R., Martinez-Funk, B., Roser, M., Voigtländer, W., Brandecker, R., & Steinert, T.
- Affiliations
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Rems-Murr-Klinikum (DE)
- Klinikum am Weissenhof (DE)
- ORCID
- Steinert, Tilman
- Venue
- Psychiatrische Praxis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-33
- ISSN
- 0303-4259 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0876
- OpenAlex
- W2246196833
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatrische Praxis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- coercive measures, physical restraint, seclusion, psychiatric inpatient care, quality indicators, incidence, data collection, data processing, case mix, hospital structure, psychosis
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Coercion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Documentation, Germany, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Patient Isolation, Psychotropic Drugs, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Restraint, Physical, Risk Management, Violence, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Benchmarking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
