The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Carcinoma: Results of a Retrospective Analysis of 308 Cases
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to define the indications and limitations of endoscopic resection (ER) of early gastric carcinoma (EGC). Over the 15 year period from 1978 to 1992, 308 early cancers were resected endoscopically either through a single operative intervention or in stages. Of 266 lesions resected in a single step, 222 (85%) entered remission. Forty-four cases had either residual or recurrent lesions. The size, histology and location affected the curability; 89% of Type IIa lesions less than 2 cm were resected curatively, while only 50% of those larger than 2 cm were resected completely. In Type IIc, 83% of lesions less than 1 cm and 57% of those greater than 1 cm were excised completely by ER. In Type IIc, curative ER was possible in 85% of differentiated carcinomas and 43% of undifferentiated carcinomas. The rate of incomplete resection was higher for lesions of the anterior or posterior wall, than for those of the lesser curvature. Semiserial sections of the resected specimens made at 2 mm intervals, indicated that, if the positive margin was confined to one section, cure may be possible by the burning effect. Follow-up showed that there was no single case undergoing endoscopic resection which subsequently died of gastric carcinoma. The lesions that are suitable for ER comprise Type IIa EGC of less than 2 cm in diameter, and Type IIc differentiated adenocarcinoma of less than 1 cm. Lesions in which the entire margin is difficult to observe by front-view endoscopy should be smaller than defined by the above criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer
Gotoda, T., Yamamoto, H., & Soetikno, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1007/s00535-006-1954-3 · Cited by 686
Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer
Gotoda, T. (2007) · Gastric Cancer · doi:10.1007/s10120-006-0408-1 · Cited by 666
Banks, M., Graham, D., Jansen, M., Gotoda, T., Coda, S., di Pietro, M., Uedo, N., Bhandari, P., Pritchard, D. M., Kuipers, E. J., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318126 · Cited by 647
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study
Isomoto, H., Shikuwa, S., Yamaguchi, N., Fukuda, E., Ikeda, K., Nishiyama, H., Ohnita, K., Mizuta, Y., Shiozawa, J., & Kohno, S. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.165381 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Takekoshi, T., Baba, Y., Ota, H., Kato, Y., Yanagisawa, A., Takagi, K., & Noguchi, Y.
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 352-358
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W2089555541
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Carcinoma: Results of a Retrospective Analysis of 308 Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2007-1008990
- The paper
- Takekoshi, T., Baba, Y., Ota, H., Kato, Y., Yanagisawa, A., Takagi, K., & Noguchi, Y. (1994). Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Carcinoma: Results of a Retrospective Analysis of 308 Cases. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1008990
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.