Femoxetine and Amitriptyline in General Practice*: A Randomized Double-Blind Group Comparison
Abstract
Patients with a depressive illness with 4 major symptoms of depression and a score of at least 17 on the Hamilton Depression Scale (1-17) (HDS) were allocated to a randomized double-blind group comparative study in general practice. After retrospective analysis, all 81 patients except one were characterized as suffering from a 'Definite Major Depressive Disorder', as defined by Spitzer et al. (1978). After 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dosage of 600 mg femoxetine or 150 mg amitriptyline, no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups were observed, either when using the HDS or the clinical global assessment scale. Confidence limits of 95% for differences between therapeutic effect showed a non-significant tendency in favour of amitriptyline. During treatment, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of HDS score between the 2 treatments in week 2. These differences were the result of amitriptyline's significantly greater effect on the 3 sleep items at week 2, as indicated by the results of single item analysis. Drop out rates due to side effects were between 14-15% in both treatment groups. Of the patients treated with femoxetine, 38% experienced no side effects, compared to 14% of patients treated with amitriptyline. Nausea was the side effect most commonly reported by patients treated with femoxetine, whereas a significantly greater frequency of anticholinergic side effects was recorded during treatment with amitriptylin…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In depressed patients, amitriptyline group showed significant reduction in HAM-D; no such change with femoxetine.
“AMI group showed sig reduction in HAMDS; no such change with femoxetine”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Skrumsager, 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antidepressants and their effect on sleep
Mayers, A. G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2005) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.726 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skrumsager, B., & Jeppesen, K.
- Affiliations
- Ferrosan Medical Devices (Denmark) (DK)
- Venue
- Pharmacopsychiatry
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 368-377
- ISSN
- 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0795
- OpenAlex
- W2066789163
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- femoxetine, amitriptyline, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, sleep disorders, anticholinergic effects, nausea, weight gain, medication adherence, general practice, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, comparative drug trial
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Amitriptyline, Antidepressive Agents, Body Weight, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Piperidines, Random Allocation, Serotonin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review