The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transgastric endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: results of a pilot study
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) access to the biliary tract is sometimes impossible and percutaneous access has the disadvantages of increased morbidity and patient discomfort. We present our first results with an alternative technique: endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided transgastric biliary drainage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 11 patients (7 men, mean age 64 years) were referred for failed ERCP and biliary obstruction (malignancy n = 8, benign conditions n = 3). The retrograde approach via the papilla had been impossible due to surgical anatomy, duodenal stenosis, and hilar stricture with occlusion of the left side. EUS-guided drainage was done with endoscopic and fluoroscopic monitoring. After puncture of the left biliary duct a guide wire was inserted into it followed by tract dilation using a cystostome. A plastic or a metallic stent was placed through this gastrobiliary fistula for bile drainage. RESULTS: EUS-guided left hepaticogastrostomy was successfully performed in 10/11 cases, with one failure of guide wire insertion after puncture. Plastic and covered metal stents were inserted in seven and three patients, respectively. Complications in the plastic stent group included one early occlusion requiring stent replacement, and one transient ileus. In the metallic stent group there was one bilioma and one cholangitis, due to stent shortening. Clinically, the stent was efficacious in all 10 cases; during a mean follow-up of 213 days (range 3-610), two patients presented with stent occlusion and one with stent migration, with successful endoscopic treatment in all. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy is an efficient technique and could be a future alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage or palliative surgical drainage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Park, D. H., Jang, J. W., Lee, S. S., Seo, D.-W., Lee, S. K., & Kim, M.-H. (2011) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.054 · Cited by 337
Mukai, S., Itoi, T., Baron, T. H., Takada, T., Strasberg, S. M., Pitt, H. A., Ukai, T., Shikata, S., Teoh, A. Y. B., Kim, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · doi:10.1002/jhbp.496 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Bories, E., Pesenti, C., Caillol, F., Lopes, C., & Giovannini, M.
- Venue
- Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2007-03-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 287-291
- ISSN
- 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8812
- OpenAlex
- W2054329722
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transgastric endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: results of a pilot study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-2007-966212
- The paper
- Bories, E., Pesenti, C., Caillol, F., Lopes, C., & Giovannini, M. (2007). Transgastric endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-966212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.