The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Patients with the New Oral Antidiabetic Agent Glimepiride (Amaryl®): A Double-Blind Comparison with Glibenclamide
Abstract
An international, prospective, double-blind trial compared the long-term therapeutic value of glimepiride with glibenclamide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients stabilised on glibenclamide were randomised to 1 mg glimepiride (524 patients) or 2.5 mg glibenclamide (520 patients). The treatment groups were comparable at baseline with respect to age (60.2 years), body mass index (26.5 kg/m2), duration of diabetes (5.0 years) and fasting blood glucose levels (163 mg/dl [9.0 mmol/l]). Doses were increased stepwise, up to 8 mg for glimepiride (once-daily) and 20 mg for glibenclamide (> 10 mg as divided dose), until metabolic control (fasting blood glucose < or = 150 mg/dl [8.3 mmol/l]), or maximum dose was achieved. After one year of treatment, patients entered a long-term follow-up study. Primary endpoints for evaluation of metabolic control, mean glycated haemoglobin and mean fasting blood glucose, were 8.4% and 174 mg/dl (9.7 mmol/l) for glimepiride and 8.3% and 168 mg/dl (9.3 mmol/l) for glibenclamide. Differences between treatment groups were not considered clinically relevant (95% confidence intervals (-0.05, 0.19%) for glycated haemoglobin and (2, 11 mg/dl) [0.1, 0.6 mmol/l] for fasting blood glucose). Statistically significant lower fasting insulin and C-peptide values were observed in glimepiride patients compared with glibenclamide (differences: insulin, -0.92 microU/ml [p = 0.04]; C-peptide, -0.14 ng/ml [p = 0.03]). Both treatment groups showed an equivalent safety profile. Adverse events were consistent with the nature of the diabetic patient population studied. Fewer hypoglycaemic reactions occurred with glimepiride than with glibenclamide (105 versus 150 episodes). The long-term follow-up (457 patients) confirmed that glimepiride (1-8 mg) once daily provides equivalent metabolic control to a higher dosage (2.5-20.0 mg) of glibenclamide. Both treatments were well tolerated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Glimepiride, a long-acting sulfonylurea, may partly fulfil this role as it has a lower affinity for the -cell receptor than glyburide (117), and its insulin secretory capacity is lower in both the fasting (118) and postprandial (119) states.”
From Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes (2005) · cites this paper as [118]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes
Zammitt, N. N., & Frier, B. M. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.12.2948 · Cited by 435
Pathophysiology and Pharmacological Treatment of Insulin Resistance
Matthaei, S., Stümvoll, M., Kellerer, M., & Häring, H. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.6.0413 · Cited by 375
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hypoglycemia and Cardiovascular Events
Gangji, A. S., Cukierman, T., Gerstein, H. C., Goldsmith, C. H., & Clase, C. M. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-1789 · Cited by 308
Cardiovascular Outcomes in Trials of Oral Diabetes Medications: A Systematic Review
Selvin, E., Bolen, S., Yeh, H.-C., Wiley, C., Wilson, L. M., Marinopoulos, S. S., Feldman, L., Vassy, J., Wilson, R., Bass, E. B., et al. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.168.19.2070 · Cited by 300
Holstein, A., Plaschke, A., & Egberts, E. (2001) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.235 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Draeger, K., Wernicke-Panten, K., Lomp, H.-J., Schüler, E., & Roßkamp, R.
- Venue
- Hormone and Metabolic Research
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 419-425
- ISSN
- 0018-5043 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-4286
- OpenAlex
- W2116836307
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hormone and Metabolic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, glimepiride, glibenclamide, sulfonylureas, long-term glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, C-peptide, hypoglycemia, drug safety, drug efficacy comparison, dose titration, beta-cell function
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glyburide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Sulfonylurea Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review