Cited by 292Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and Cortisol

Serum Endocannabinoid Content is Altered in Females with Depressive Disorders: A Preliminary Report

Open access
Hill, M., Miller, G., Ho, W.-S., Gorzalka, B., Hillard, C.·2008·Pharmacopsychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical research has suggested that the endocannabinoid system may be involved in the etiology and/or treatment of depression; however, there are no published studies examining circulating endocannabinoid content in patients with clinical depression. METHODS: This study examined the endocannabinoids (anandamide; AEA) and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) in serum from ambulatory, medication-free female patients diagnosed with minor or major depression, and in controls matched for demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Serum 2-AG content was significantly decreased in patients diagnosed with major depression, and this decrease was correlated significantly and negatively with duration of the depressive episode, such that 2-AG content was progressively lower the longer the depressive episode. While AEA was not associated with major depression PER SE, a strong negative correlation was found between serum AEA content and Hamilton ratings for cognitive and somatic anxiety, suggesting that AEA content may relate to the anxiety dimension of affective disorders. In subjects with minor depression, serum AEA was significantly elevated, with 2-AG content demonstrating a similar, but statistically insignificant trend. DISCUSSION: These are the first clinical data to indicate that the endocannabinoid system may be disturbed in affective disease, and suggest that future research is required to determine the relevance of these changes with respect to disease manifestation and pharmacotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2007-993211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 292

Authors
Hill, M., Miller, G., Ho, W.-S., Gorzalka, B., & Hillard, C.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Pharmacopsychiatry
Published
2008-03
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
48-53
ISSN
  • 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0795
OpenAlex
W2074698946
Cited by
292
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 16967, R01DA016967)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
endocannabinoid system, depression, anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, female patients, major depressive disorder, minor depression, anxiety, depressive episode duration, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Arachidonic Acids, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Glycerides, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Mass Spectrometry, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review