Early clinical evaluation of AI triage of chest radiographs: time to diagnosis for suspected cancer and number of urgent CT referrals
Abstract
AbstractLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United Kingdom. Early diagnosis and rapid access to treatment are associated with better outcomes but are dependent on prompt recognition of findings and the availability of a computed tomography (CT) scanner and reporting. In this clinical evaluation case study, we report the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to triage suspected cancer on chest x-rays to a "radiographer-led same-day CT pathway." We included 56,257 chest radiographs acquired before and after real-world AI deployment across a National Health Service trust comprising five hospitals in South West London over a 3-year study period between January 2022 and December 2024 (1 year preintervention and 2 years postintervention). The time from chest radiograph acquisition to CT report for cases with suspected lung cancer was reduced from 6.0 to 3.6 days, with the most significant reductions at centers with colocated CT and x-ray facilities and no significant increase in the proportion of CTs performed relative to chest x-rays. In detecting suspected cancer, the 14-feature AI triage model has an 82.5% sensitivity, a 90.5% specificity, a 14.6% positive predictive value, and a 99.6% negative predictive value for possible lung cancer on chest x-rays. Features such as focal airspace opacity and single pulmonary nodule returned the highest proportion of false-positive results, while pulmonary and mediastinal masses had a greater diagnostic yield. This work…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The AI tool halved the time to CT within the AI-enabled patient pathway over a 2-year period.
“including halving the time to CT within this AI-enabled patient pathway over a 2-year period 8”
From Radiology staff perspectives after decommissioning an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for expedited lung cancer triage (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
Bernstein, M. H., Atalay, M. K., Dibble, E. H., Maxwell, A. W. P., Karam, A. R., Agarwal, S., Ward, R. C., Healey, T. T., & Baird, G. L. (2023) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09747-1 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Packer, J., Dean, G., Storey, M., Malamateniou, C., & Shelmerdine, S. C. (2026) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8941291/v1
Self-citation
- Authors
- Storey, M., Packer, J., Grandal, N. S., Rhodes, A., Moon, J., Togher, D., Abubacker, Z., Rickaby, S., Dean, G., & Shelmerdine, S. C.
- Affiliations
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- South West London AI Working Group, London, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- NEJM AI
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2026-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- AIcs2500539-AIcs2500539
- ISSN
- 2836-9386 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4417464596
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NEJM AI (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, chest radiograph, triage, suspected cancer, time to diagnosis, lung cancer detection, clinical evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, London, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Referral and Consultation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Radiography, Thoracic, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Triage, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review