Cited by 45Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Automated insulin delivery in older adults with type 1 diabetes

Open access
Kudva, Yogish C., Henderson, Robert J., Kanapka, Lauren G., Weinstock, Ruth S., Rickels, Michael R., Pratley, Richard E., Chaytor, Naomi, Janess, Kamille +11 more·2025·NEJM Evidence

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults with type 1 diabetes are at risk for serious hypoglycemia. Automated insulin delivery can reduce risk but has not been sufficiently evaluated in this population. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized crossover trial in adults older than or equal to 65 years of age with type 1 diabetes. Participants completed three 12-week periods of using hybrid closed loop, predictive low-glucose suspend, and sensor-augmented pump insulin delivery in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the percentage of time with continuous glucose monitoring glucose values less than 70 mg/dl. RESULTS: Eighty-two participants between 65 and 86 years of age were randomly assigned: 45% were female; the baseline mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin level was 7.2±0.9%; and the baseline percentage of time with glucose values less than 70 mg/dl was 2.49±1.78%. In the sensor-augmented pump, hybrid closed-loop, and predictive low-glucose suspend periods, percentages of time with glucose less than 70 mg/dl were 2.57±1.54%, 1.58±0.95%, and 1.67±0.96%, respectively. Compared with the sensor-augmented pump results, the mean difference with the hybrid closed-loop system was -1.05 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.48 to -0.73 percentage points; P<0.001) and with the predictive low-glucose suspend system it was -0.93 percentage points (95% CI, -1.27 to -0.66 percentage points; P<0.001). Comparing a hybrid closed-loop system with a sensor-augmented pump, time in the range 70 to 180 mg/dl changed by 8.9 percentage points (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.4 percentage points) and the glycated hemoglobin level changed by 0.2 percentage points (95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1 percentage points). Serious adverse events were uncommon. Severe hypoglycemia occurred in 4% or less of participants; there were two hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with type 1 diabetes, automated insulin delivery decreased hypoglycemia compared with sensor-augmented pump delivery. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04016662.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/evidoa2400200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world data also aligned with clinical trial outcomes showing HbA1c reductions of 0.3-0.7% across diverse age groups.

    “Realworld data also aligned with clinical trial outcomes showing HbA₁ c reductions of 0•3-0•7% across diverse age groups.95,101,102”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Results (Abstract; page not available in our copy) report an HbA1c reduction with hybrid closed-loop delivery, but the mean difference was 0.2%, not 0.3–0.7%. The trial enrolled only adults aged 65–86 and does not establish an outcome across diverse age groups or compare its findings with real-world data. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 45

Authors
Kudva, Y. C., Henderson, R. J., Kanapka, L. G., Weinstock, R. S., Rickels, M. R., Pratley, R. E., Chaytor, N., Janess, K., Desjardins, D., Pattan, V., Peleckis, A. J., Casu, A., Rizvi, S. R., Bzdick, S., Whitaker, K. J., Jo Kamimoto, J. L., Miller, K., Kollman, C., & Beck, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • AdventHealth Orlando (US)
  • Washington State University Spokane (US)
  • Elkhart Clinic (US)
  • Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, and Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
  • T1D Exchange (US)
Venue
NEJM Evidence
Published
2025-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
EVIDoa2400200-EVIDoa2400200
ISSN
2766-5526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405720417
Cited by
45
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 1
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NEJM Evidence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania (UL1 TR001878)
  • Dexcom
  • Tandem Diabetes Care
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001878)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK122603, U01DK144420)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, older adults, artificial pancreas, hybrid closed-loop system, predictive low glucose suspend, sensor-augmented pump, hypoglycemia, glycemic control, HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring, diabetic ketoacidosis, time in range, insulin pump therapy, hospitalization risk, adverse events, crossover trial, glycemic variability
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review