Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relation between Exposure to Asbestos and Mesothelioma

Selikoff, Irving J., Churg, Jacob, Hammond, E. Cuyler·1965·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

IN 1960 Wagner, Sleggs and Marchand1 reported 33 cases of diffuse pleural mesothelioma from the North Western Cape Province of South Africa. The collection of such a large number of cases of a rare tumor within a short time (1956–1960) in one area was considered unusual enough. Even more striking was the fact that close questioning and investigation revealed that 32 patients had evidence, admittedly circumstantial in most cases, of some potential or actual contact with asbestos by virtue either of residence in mining areas or in industry twenty to forty years before.This remarkable concentration of cases in one . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm196503182721104

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Selikoff, I. J., Churg, J., & Hammond, E. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1965-03-18
Volume
272
Issue
11
Pages
560-565
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2317355101
Cited by
355
References
0
FWCI
38.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.