Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Human Brain — Morphologic Differences in the Hemispheres Demonstrable by Carotid Arteriography

LeMay, Marjorie, Culebras, Antonio·1972·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Functional differences of the cerebral hemispheres are great, but few consistent morphologic differences have been noted. On carotid arteriograms and on coronal sections of brains through the posterior ends of the sylvian fissures, we found the parietal operculum to be more highly developed on the left than on the right in 38 of 44 persons. However, arteriograms suggested that in 15 of 18 left-handed persons right parietal opercularization is as great as on the left. The study showed definite morphologic differences between the right and left hemispheres in a region of major importance for language. Endocranial casts of a fossil skull suggest that these differences were present in Neanderthal man. Arteriography offers a method of studying anatomic hemispheric differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197207272870404

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LeMay, M., & Culebras, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1972-07-27
Volume
287
Issue
4
Pages
168-170
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2315582874
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.