Role of Blood Pressure in the Development of Congestive Heart Failure: The Framingham Study
Abstract
A representative population sample of 5192 men and women was followed for 16 years, during which overt congestive heart failure (CHF) developed in 142. In the age range from 30 to 62 years the dominant etiologic precursor was hypertension, which preceded CHF in 75 per cent of the cases. Six times more CHF developed in hypertensive than in normotensive persons. Examination of the association of myocardial hypertrophy on x-ray or electrocardiographic study with systolic versus diastolic pressure revealed little to suggest a greater role for diastolic pressure. Systolic and diastolic pressure together, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, and tension-time index discriminated potential hypertrophy and CHF no better than systolic pressure alone. Examination of the correlation of heart weight and left ventricular thickness at autopsy with premorbid systolic versus diastolic pressure revealed a better correlation with systolic than with diastolic pressure. CHF was a lethal phenomenon, with only 50 per cent surviving for five years. Early, vigorous and sustained control of elevated blood pressure — systolic as well as diastolic — appears the chief means for preventing CHF in the general population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 1977 Joint National Committee report still recommended diastolic blood pressure as the basis for diagnosing and treating hypertension.
“The Committee still recommended diastolic blood pressure as the basis for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, but over the next decade, the emphasis on diastolic blood pressure as the principal treatment target was dropped after randomized controlled trials demonstrated the cardiovascular benefits of systolic blood pressure reduction.46,47”
From The Framingham Heart Study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: a historical perspective (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 603
- Authors
- Kannel, W. B., Castelli, W. P., McNamara, P. M., McKee, P. A., & Feinleib, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Feinleib, Manning
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1972-10-19
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 781-787
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2044392809
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- congestive heart failure, hypertension, blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, cardiac hypertrophy, left ventricular wall thickness, heart weight, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, tension-time index, heart failure etiology, heart failure mortality, blood pressure control, heart failure prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Autopsy, Blood Pressure, Electrocardiography, Female, Health Surveys, Cardiomegaly, Heart Failure, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Pulse, Radiography, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review