Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Brain Edema

Fishman, Robert A.·1975·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BRAIN edema traditionally has been viewed by pathologists and clinicians as a common and often nonspecific finding in a wide variety of cerebral disorders, in association with tumors, trauma, and infections, as well as with toxic, anoxic, and metabolic disorders. In the last decade, clinical investigations and detailed laboratory studies of brain edema, using neurochemical, physiologic, and ultrastructural technics, have clarified many pathological and clinical uncertainties.1 2 3 It is now clear that cerebral edema may occur in several different forms, and that it is inappropriate to view brain edema as a single pathologic or clinical entity. This review summarizes the studies . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197510022931407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 411

Metadata

Authors
Fishman, R. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1975-10-02
Volume
293
Issue
14
Pages
706-711
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4242759712
Cited by
411
References
0
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Edema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197510022931407
The paper
Fishman, R. A. (1975). Brain Edema. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197510022931407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.