The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frequency and Clinical Description of High-Cost Patients in 17 Acute-Care Hospitals
Abstract
To assess the potential impact of national "catastrophic" health insurance on the medical-care system, the frequency and clinical characteristics of high-cost patients were surveyed at 17 acute-care hospitals in the San Francisco Bay Area. The percentage of patients whose yearly hospital charges exceeded $4000 in 1976 ranged from 4 at a community hospital to 24 at a referral hospital. Hospital costs charged to these patients ranged from 20 to 68 per cent of total billings, with the highest percentages generally occurring at large referral hospitals. Forty-seven per cent of adult high-cost patients had chronic medical conditions, and only one in six suffered from an acute medical "catastrophe." In addition, more than 13 per cent of high-cost patients died in the hospital. National catastrophic health insurance is likely to pay for much chronic illness and terminal care and divert resources toward acute-care hospitals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lifetime medical costs of heavy smokers and/or heavy drinkers, inferred from studies of high-cost hospital users (Schroeder, Showstack, and Roberts 1979), appear to be as much as four times those of individuals with moderate habits, even though the duration of life is shorter.”
From The Compression of Morbidity (2005) · cites this paper as Schroeder, Showstack, and Roberts 1979
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1215/03616878-1-1-22 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197610142951605 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197803232981204 · DOI
- 10.2307/3349642 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197406132902404 · DOI
- Birnbaum H: The Cost of Catastrophic Illness. Toronto, Lexington Books, 1978 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197604292941805 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM197507312930506 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-501 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FRIES, J. F. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00401.x · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, S. A., Showstack, J. A., & Roberts, H. E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1979-06-07
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1306-1309
- ISSN
- 0028-4793
- 1533-4406
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review