Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hypoxic Sensitizers — Implications for Radiation Therapy

Chapman, J. Donald·1979·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

THE proliferative capacity of human cells can be destroyed by ionizing radiation, and the rate of killing by radiation is 2.5 to three times higher in the presence of oxygen than under hypoxic conditions. Since solid tumors often have zones of necrosis and consequently are likely to contain hypoxic yet viable cells, this radiobiologic effect may have implications for cancer therapy. Radioresistant tumor cells that survive treatment can become reoxygenated and lead to a recurrence of the disease.A recent analysis of 2803 patients with carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy indicated that those with hemoglobin levels of . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm197912273012606

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, J. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1979-12-27
Volume
301
Issue
26
Pages
1429-1432
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2117374129
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypoxic Sensitizers — Implications for Radiation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm197912273012606
The paper
Chapman, J. D. (1979). Hypoxic Sensitizers — Implications for Radiation Therapy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197912273012606

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.