The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Clinical Angiographic Study
Abstract
To identify predictors of late mortality, 259 consecutive men (less than or equal to 60 years old) who survived acute myocardial infarctions were catheterized one month after admission and were then followed for a mean of 34 months. Nineteen patients (7 per cent) died during the observation period. Of 79 base-line descriptors, 17 proved to be univariate predictors of survival. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the ejection fraction (P less than 0.001), the number of diseased vessels (P less than 0.005), and the occurrence of congestive heart failure in the coronary unit (P less than 0.01) were the only independent predictors of survival. Risk stratification showed that the probability of survival at four years was highest in patients with normal ejection fractions (96 to 100 per cent, depending on the number of diseased vessels) and lowest in those with ejection fractions below 20 per cent (3o to 75 per cent). The prognosis in patients with ejection fractions between 21 and 49 per cent was significantly worse (78 per cent) than in those with normal ejection fractions only in the group with three-vessel involvement (P less than 0.01). Since most survivors of myocardial infarction who are likely to have their lives prolonged by coronary-artery bypass surgery are in this group, it is reasonable to limit routine coronary angiography to the 56 per cent of survivors who have ejection fractions between 21 and 49 per cent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
White, H. D., Norris, R. M., Brown, M. A., Brandt, P. W., Whitlock, R. M., & Wild, C. J. (1987) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.76.1.44 · Cited by 2,363
Goldberger, J. J., Cain, M. E., Hohnloser, S. H., Kadish, A. H., Knight, B. P., Lauer, M. S., Maron, B. J., Page, R. L., Passman, R. S., Siscovick, D., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.189375 · Cited by 1,450
Scanlon, P. J., Faxon, D. P., Audet, A.-M., Carabello, B., Dehmer, G. J., Eagle, K. A., Legako, R. D., Leon, D. F., Murray, J. A., Nissen, S. E., et al. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6 · Cited by 1,123
Schmidt, G., Malik, M., Barthel, P., Schneider, R., Ulm, K., Rolnitzky, L., Camm, A. J., Bigger, J. T., & Schömig, A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08428-1 · Cited by 716
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanz, G., Castañer, A., Betriu, A., Magriña, J., Roig, E., Coll, S., Paré, J. C., & Navarro-López, F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1982-05-06
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1065-1070
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2338398701
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Clinical Angiographic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198205063061801
- The paper
- Sanz, G., Castañer, A., Betriu, A., Magriña, J., Roig, E., Coll, S., Paré, J. C., & Navarro-López, F. (1982). Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Clinical Angiographic Study. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198205063061801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.