The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Abstract
We evaluated the economic aspects of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants, using outcomes and costs of care before and after the introduction of a regional neonatal-intensive-care program. Neonatal intensive care increased both survival rates and costs. For newborns weighing 1000 to 1499 g, the cost (in 1978 Canadian dollars) was $59,500 per additional survivor, $2,900 per life-year gained, and $3,200 per quality-adjusted life-year gained; intensive care resulted in a net economic gain when figures were undiscounted but a net economic loss when future costs, effects, and earnings were discounted at 5 per cent per annum. For infants weighing 500 to 999 g, the corresponding costs were $102,500 per additional survivor, $9,300 per life-year gained, and $22,400 per quality-adjusted life-year gained; intensive care resulted in a net economic loss. By every measure of economic evaluation, the impact of neonatal intensive care was more favorable among infants weighing 1000 to 1499 g than among those weighing 500 to 999 g. A judgment concerning the relative economic value of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants requires a comparison with other health programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity
McCormick, M. C. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198501103120204 · Cited by 2,119
The Role of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health and Medicine
Russell, L. B. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028 · Cited by 1,167
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Barr, R. D., Torrance, G. W., Rosenbaum, P., & Weitzman, S. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1992.10.6.923 · Cited by 304
Self-citationReilly, M. C., Gooch, K. L., Wong, R. L., Kupper, H., & van der Heijde, D. (2010) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kep457 · Cited by 242
A structured instrument for estimating the economic cost of drug abuse treatment
French, M. T., Dunlap, L. J., Zarkin, G. A., McGeary, K. A., & Thomas McLellan, A. (1997) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00132-3 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyle, M. H., Torrance, G. W., Sinclair, J. C., & Horwood, S. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1983-06-02
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1330-1337
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2037761530
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198306023082206
- The paper
- Boyle, M. H., Torrance, G. W., Sinclair, J. C., & Horwood, S. P. (1983). Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198306023082206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.