The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Survival of Patients with a Low Ejection Fraction
Abstract
The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) was designed to compare medical and surgical treatment of selected patients with chronic, stable coronary artery disease. This report concerns a subset of patients with reduced ventricular function. Of 780 patients randomly assigned to medical or surgical treatment, 160 had ejection fractions above 0.34 but below 0.50 at base line and have been followed for an average of seven years. Eighty-two patients were assigned to medical therapy, and 78 to surgery; the two groups were comparable at base line with regard to prognostically important variables. At seven years, 84 per cent of patients in the surgical group were alive, as compared with 70 per cent of the medical group (P = 0.01). Nearly half the patients with impaired ventricular function had triple-vessel disease at entry; at seven years, observed survival in this group was 88 and 65 per cent for those assigned to surgical and medical treatment, respectively (P = 0.009). Survival of patients with single-vessel or double-vessel disease was similar in the two treatment groups. We conclude that patients with triple-vessel disease and ejection fractions higher than 0.34 but lower than 0.50 appear to have improved seven-year survival with elective bypass surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Neumann, F.-J., Sousa-Uva, M., Ahlsson, A., Alfonso, F., Banning, A. P., Benedetto, U., Byrne, R. A., Collet, J.-P., Falk, V., Head, S. J., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 · Cited by 7,167
2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease
Task Force Members, Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., Bugiardini, R., Crea, F., Cuisset, T., et al. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht296 · Cited by 4,510
White, H. D., Norris, R. M., Brown, M. A., Brandt, P. W., Whitlock, R. M., & Wild, C. J. (1987) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.76.1.44 · Cited by 2,363
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.167586 · Cited by 2,251
Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel Disease
(1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199607253350401 · Cited by 1,531
Metadata
- Authors
- Passamani, E., Davis, K. B., Gillespie, M. J., Killip, T., & The CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates*
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1985-06-27
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1665-1671
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2317885663
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Survival of Patients with a Low Ejection Fraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198506273122603
- The paper
- Passamani, E., Davis, K. B., Gillespie, M. J., Killip, T., & The CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates*. (1985). A Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Survival of Patients with a Low Ejection Fraction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198506273122603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.