The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation
Abstract
In a multicenter trial we investigated the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on graft and patient survival, renal function, and complications in 291 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. One hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned to treatment with cyclosporine and prednisone, and 149 to control immunosuppressive therapy (azathioprine and prednisone, with or without antilymphocyte globulin). At three years graft survival was 69 percent in the cyclosporine-treated patients and 58 percent in the controls (P = 0.05). The number of episodes of graft rejection was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the controls. Patients survival after three years was 90 percent in the cyclosporine group and 82 percent in the control group (P = 0.04). Acute tubular necrosis was an important risk factor for graft loss in both groups. Risk factors for death included diabetes and older age of the recipient. Renal function as indicated by the serum creatinine concentration or creatinine clearance was poorer in the cyclosporine-treated patients than in the controls, but has remained stable in both groups since the sixth month after transplantation. We conclude that, among recipients of cadaveric renal transplants, those treated with cyclosporine, despite having poorer (but stable) renal function, have better graft and patient survival at three years than those treated with alternative forms of immunosuppressive therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cattran, D. C., Appel, G. B., Hebert, L. A., Hunsicker, L. G., Pohl, M. A., Hoy, W. E., Maxwell, D. R., & Kunis, C. L. (1999) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00778.x · Cited by 326
Kahan, B. D., Julian, B. A., Pescovitz, M. D., Vanrenterghem, Y., & Neylan, J. (1999) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-199911270-00016 · Cited by 279
Gut Microbiota and Tacrolimus Dosing in Kidney Transplantation
Lee, J. R., Muthukumar, T., Dadhania, D., Taur, Y., Jenq, R. R., Toussaint, N. C., Ling, L., Pamer, E., & Suthanthiran, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122399 · Cited by 211
Nelson, J., Alvey, N., Bowman, L., Schulte, J., Segovia, M. C., McDermott, J., Te, H. S., Kapila, N., Levine, D. J., Gottlieb, R. L., et al. (2022) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2716 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- The Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-05-08
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1219-1225
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4254614326
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198605083141904
- The paper
- The Canadian Multicentre Transplant Study Group. (1986). A Randomized Clinical Trial of Cyclosporine in Cadaveric Renal Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198605083141904
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.