Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults

Smoller, Bruce R., Kruskall, Margot S.·1986·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Although anemia is a frequently observed complication of phlebotomies for laboratory tests in neonates, this problem has received little attention in adult populations. We analyzed the phlebotomy records of 100 hospitalized patients and found that 50 patients who spent all of their hospitalization in general wards had blood samples drawn an average of 1.1 times a day. A mean volume of 12.4 ml a day was drawn, and the total volume drawn during their entire hospitalization was 175.0 ml. In contrast, 50 patients who spent part or all of their hospitalization in an intensive care unit were phlebotomized a mean of 3.4 times a day, for a mean volume of 41.5 ml of blood drawn a day and a total volume of 762.2 ml. Patients in the intensive care unit who had arterial lines had more blood drawn (944.0 ml), more often (4.0 times a day), than patients in the intensive care unit who did not have such lines (300.9 ml; 1.9 times a day). Of 36 patients who received transfusions, 17 (47 percent) had large losses from phlebotomy (greater than 180 ml of red cells) that contributed to their transfusion requirements. We propose the use of sample tubes of the size used in pediatrics, batching of requests for laboratory tests, and review of the cumulative volume of blood removed from individual patients as approaches to reducing blood loss from phlebotomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198605083141906

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Smoller, B. R., & Kruskall, M. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1986-05-08
Volume
314
Issue
19
Pages
1233-1235
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1998341324
Cited by
299
References
0
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198605083141906
The paper
Smoller, B. R., & Kruskall, M. S. (1986). Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198605083141906

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.