The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults
Abstract
Although anemia is a frequently observed complication of phlebotomies for laboratory tests in neonates, this problem has received little attention in adult populations. We analyzed the phlebotomy records of 100 hospitalized patients and found that 50 patients who spent all of their hospitalization in general wards had blood samples drawn an average of 1.1 times a day. A mean volume of 12.4 ml a day was drawn, and the total volume drawn during their entire hospitalization was 175.0 ml. In contrast, 50 patients who spent part or all of their hospitalization in an intensive care unit were phlebotomized a mean of 3.4 times a day, for a mean volume of 41.5 ml of blood drawn a day and a total volume of 762.2 ml. Patients in the intensive care unit who had arterial lines had more blood drawn (944.0 ml), more often (4.0 times a day), than patients in the intensive care unit who did not have such lines (300.9 ml; 1.9 times a day). Of 36 patients who received transfusions, 17 (47 percent) had large losses from phlebotomy (greater than 180 ml of red cells) that contributed to their transfusion requirements. We propose the use of sample tubes of the size used in pediatrics, batching of requests for laboratory tests, and review of the cumulative volume of blood removed from individual patients as approaches to reducing blood loss from phlebotomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidence of Anemia in Older People: An Epidemiologic Study in a Well Defined Population
Anía, B. J., Suman, V. J., Fairbanks, V. F., Rademacher, D. M., & III, L. J. M. (1997) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01509.x · Cited by 287
Thavendiranathan, P., Bagai, A., Ebidia, A., Detsky, A. S., & Choudhry, N. K. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0094.x · Cited by 260
Salisbury, A. C. (2011) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.361 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Smoller, B. R., & Kruskall, M. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-05-08
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1233-1235
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1998341324
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198605083141906
- The paper
- Smoller, B. R., & Kruskall, M. S. (1986). Phlebotomy for Diagnostic Laboratory Tests in Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198605083141906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.