The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relation between Survival and Age at Diagnosis in Breast Cancer
Abstract
We analyzed the relation between age at diagnosis and relative survival (ratio of observed to expected survival) in 57,068 women in Sweden in whom breast cancer was diagnosed in 1960 to 1978 (about 98 percent of all cases). Women who were 45 to 49 years old had the best prognosis, with a relative survival exceeding that of the youngest patients (less than 30 years) by 7.6 to 12.9 percent at different periods of observation. Relative survival declined markedly after the age of 49--particularly in women aged 50 to 59--and the oldest women (greater than 75) had the worst rate. The difference in relative survival between those older than 75 and those 45 to 49 increased from 8.6 percent at 2 years to 12.2, 20.3, and 27.5 percent after 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up, respectively. The long-term annual mortality rate due to breast cancer approached 1 to 2 percent at the premenopausal ages but exceeded 5 percent throughout the period of observation in the oldest age group. An understanding of the biologic basis for the complex relation between age and prognosis might provide a better understanding of the natural history of breast cancer in women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Cited by
Gnerlich, J. L., Deshpande, A. D., Jeffe, D. B., Sweet, A., White, N., & Margenthaler, J. A. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.001 · Cited by 441
Younger women with breast carcinoma have a poorer prognosis than older women
Chung, M., Chang, H. R., Bland, K. I., & Wanebo, H. J. (1996) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<97::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 382
Very young women (<35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation
Colleoni, M., Rotmensz, N., Robertson, C., Orlando, L., Viale, G., Renne, G., Luini, A., Veronesi, P., Intra, M., Orecchia, R., et al. (2002) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf039 · Cited by 371
How ageing processes influence cancer
de Magalhães, J. P. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3497 · Cited by 367
Del Mastro, L., Boni, L., Michelotti, A., Gamucci, T., Olmeo, N., Gori, S., Giordano, M., Garrone, O., Pronzato, P., Bighin, C., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.991 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Adami, H.-O., Malker, B., Holmberg, L., Persson, I., & Stone, B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-08-28
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 559-563
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1984078429
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relation between Survival and Age at Diagnosis in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198608283150906
- The paper
- Adami, H.-O., Malker, B., Holmberg, L., Persson, I., & Stone, B. (1986). The Relation between Survival and Age at Diagnosis in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198608283150906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.