The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy of Pneumococcal Vaccine in High-Risk Patients
Abstract
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients (patients with one or more of the following: age above 55 years and the presence of chronic cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic disease, alcoholism, or diabetes mellitus). Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients (27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients). Vaccine-serotype Streptococcus pneumoniae strains were recovered in association with 11 infections in the placebo group and 14 infections in the vaccine group. Pneumococcal infections occurred most frequently among patients with chronic pulmonary, cardiac, or renal diseases. Among vaccine recipients who subsequently had vaccine-type pneumonia or bronchitis, the majority did not make or sustain serum antibodies against their infecting organism in concentrations that were twice as high as the base-line values, or more than 400 ng of antibody nitrogen per milliliter, although their base-line levels were higher than those in subjects in whom infection did not develop. We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population. Our data suggest that chronically ill patients, who are most susceptible to infection, may have an impaired immune response to the pneumococcal vaccine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
The Protective Efficacy of Polyvalent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine
Shapiro, E. D., Berg, A. T., Austrian, R., Schroeder, D., Parcells, V., Margolis, A., Adair, R. K., & Clemens, J. D. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111213252101 · Cited by 1,051
Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Older Adults
Jackson, L. A., Neuzil, K. M., Yu, O., Benson, P., Barlow, W. E., Adams, A. L., Hanson, C. A., Mahoney, L. D., Shay, D. K., & Thompson, W. W. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022678 · Cited by 608
Bacterial Infection in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Murphy, T. F., & Sethi, S. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.1067 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Simberkoff, M. S., Cross, A. P., Al-Ibrahim, M., Baltch, A. L., Geiseler, P. J., Nadler, J., Richmond, A. S., Smith, R. P., Schiffman, G., Shepard, D. S., & Van Eeckhout, J. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1986-11-20
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1318-1327
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2327550906
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of Pneumococcal Vaccine in High-Risk Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198611203152104
- The paper
- Simberkoff, M. S., Cross, A. P., Al-Ibrahim, M., Baltch, A. L., Geiseler, P. J., Nadler, J., Richmond, A. S., Smith, R. P., Schiffman, G., Shepard, D. S., & Van Eeckhout, J. P. (1986). Efficacy of Pneumococcal Vaccine in High-Risk Patients. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198611203152104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.