The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoid Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Clinical Signs of Systemic Sepsis
Abstract
We conducted a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of early short-term, high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate in 223 patients with clinical signs of systemic sepsis and a normal sensorium (112 received glucocorticoid and 111 placebo). Patients also received antibiotics and intravenous fluids. Glucocorticoid or placebo was administered intravenously by a bolus (30 mg per kilogram of body weight over 15 minutes) followed by infusion of 5 mg per kilogram per hour for nine hours. The average time between the diagnosis of sepsis and infusion was 2.8 hours. The principal end point was 14-day mortality, which was similar in the placebo (22 percent) and glucocorticoid (21 percent) groups (P = 0.97). Mortality was also not significantly different between those receiving placebo and those receiving glucocorticoid in subgroups with evidence of sepsis (21 vs. 19 percent), gram-negative bacteremia (27 vs. 7 percent), gram-positive bacteremia (18 vs. 26 percent), or all gram-negative infections (25 vs. 17 percent). Resolution of secondary infection within 14 days was significantly higher in patients receiving placebo (12 of 23) than in those receiving glucocorticoid (3 of 16) (P = 0.03), but mortality rates were similar in both treatment groups for those with unresolved infection (36 vs. 31 percent). We conclude that early high-dose glucocorticoid therapy does not reduce mortality significantly in patients with systemic sepsis who have a normal sensorium, and therefore should not be used as adjunctive therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
Keel, M., & Trentz, O. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.037 · Cited by 885
KAPCALA, L. P., CHAUTARD, T., & ESKAY, R. L. (1995) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb44699.x · Cited by 103
Adrenal insufficiency in critical illness
Cooper, M. S., & Stewart, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1177/0885066607307832 · Cited by 97
Dynamic Pituitary-Adrenal Interactions in Response to Cardiac Surgery*
Gibbison, B., Spiga, F., Walker, J. J., Russell, G. M., Stevenson, K., Kershaw, Y., Zhao, Z., Henley, D., Angelini, G. D., & Lightman, S. L. (2015) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000000773 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- The Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group*
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1987-09-10
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 659-665
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4233474789
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoid Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Clinical Signs of Systemic Sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198709103171102
- The paper
- The Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group*. (1987). Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoid Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Clinical Signs of Systemic Sepsis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198709103171102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.