Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy of Haemophilus Iinfluenzae Type b Polysaccharide–Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine in Infancy

Eskola, Juhani, Peltola, Heikki, Takala, Aino Kaarina, Käyhty, Helena, Hakulinen, Maija, Karanko, Viena, Kela, Eija, Rekola, Panu, Rönnberg, Pirjo-Riitta, Samuelson, Joel S., Gordon, Lance K., Mäkelä, P. Helena·1987·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine has recently been shown to be capable of inducing antibodies to H. influenzae in infants. In an evaluation of its clinical efficacy, 60,000 children were enrolled in an open trial in Finland. Children born on odd-numbered days between October 1, 1985, and September 30, 1986, received the vaccine at 3, 4, 6, and 14 months; those born on even-numbered days served as controls. The geometric mean antibody titer measured in a cohort of 99 children rose from a prevaccination level of 0.08 microgram per milliliter at three months of age to 0.42 microgram per milliliter at seven months. Only minor adverse reactions were reported. Up to February 1987, two cases of invasive H. influenzae infection had occurred among the children who had received three doses of vaccine, whereas 12 cases had occurred among the controls (P = 0.0005 by Poisson one-tailed test). The rate of short-term (average follow-up time, five months) protection provided by this conjugate vaccine in infancy was thus 83 percent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198709173171201

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Eskola, J., Peltola, H., Takala, A. K., Käyhty, H., Hakulinen, M., Karanko, V., Kela, E., Rekola, P., Rönnberg, P.-R., Samuelson, J. S., Gordon, L. K., & Mäkelä, P. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1987-09-17
Volume
317
Issue
12
Pages
717-722
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2318929454
Cited by
258
References
0
FWCI
30.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.