The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi
Abstract
We conducted a pilot study followed by a large clinical trial in Nepal of the use of the capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi (Vi) as a vaccine to prevent typhoid fever. In the pilot study, involving 274 Nepalese, there were no significant side effects of the Vi vaccine; about 75 percent responded with a rise in serum antibodies of fourfold or more. In the clinical trial, residents of five villages were given intramuscular injections of either Vi or, as a control, pneumococcus vaccine dispensed in coded, randomly arranged, single-dose syringes. There were 6907 participants, of whom 6438 were members of the target population (5 to 44 years of age); each was visited every two days. Those with temperatures of 37.8 degrees C or higher for three consecutive days were examined and asked to give blood for culture. Typhoid was diagnosed as either blood culture-positive or clinically suspected on the basis of bradycardia, splenomegaly, and fever, with a negative blood culture. Seventeen months after vaccination, the codes were broken for the 71 patients meeting the criteria for either culture-positive or clinically suspected typhoid. The attack rate of typhoid was 16.2 per 1000 among the controls and 4.1 per 1000 among those immunized with Vi (P less than 0.00001). The efficacy of Vi was 72 percent in the culture-positive cases, 80 percent in the clinically suspected cases, and 75 percent in the two groups combined. These data provide evidence that Vi antibodies confer protection against typhoid. Surveillance continues to determine the duration of Vi-induced immunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The global burden of typhoid fever.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,965
Parry, C. M., Hien, T. T., Dougan, G., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. J. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra020201 · Cited by 1,112
Buckle, G. C., Walker, C. L. F., & Black, R. E. (2012) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.01.010401 · Cited by 438
Buckle, G. C., Walker, C. L. F., & Black, R. E. (2012) · PubMed · doi:10.7189/jogh.02.010401 · Cited by 429
Jin, C., Gibani, M. M., Moore, M., Juel, H. B., Jones, E., Meiring, J., Harris, V., Gardner, J., Nebykova, A., Kerridge, S. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32149-9 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Acharya, I. L., Lowe, C. U., Thapa, R., Gurubacharya, V. L., Shrestha, M. B., Cadoz, M., Schulz, D., Armand, J., Bryla, D. A., Trollfors, B., Cramton, T., Schneerson, R., & Robbins, J. B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1987-10-29
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1101-1104
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2317097995
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198710293171801
- The paper
- Acharya, I. L., Lowe, C. U., Thapa, R., Gurubacharya, V. L., Shrestha, M. B., Cadoz, M., Schulz, D., Armand, J., Bryla, D. A., Trollfors, B., Cramton, T., Schneerson, R., & Robbins, J. B. (1987). Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198710293171801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.