Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 387

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi

Acharya, Iswar L., Lowe, Charles U., Thapa, Rita, Gurubacharya, Vijay L., Shrestha, M.B., Cadoz, Michel, Schulz, Dominique, Armand, Jacques, Bryla, Dolores A., Trollfors, Birger, Cramton, Tod, Schneerson, Rachel, Robbins, John B.·1987·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We conducted a pilot study followed by a large clinical trial in Nepal of the use of the capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi (Vi) as a vaccine to prevent typhoid fever. In the pilot study, involving 274 Nepalese, there were no significant side effects of the Vi vaccine; about 75 percent responded with a rise in serum antibodies of fourfold or more. In the clinical trial, residents of five villages were given intramuscular injections of either Vi or, as a control, pneumococcus vaccine dispensed in coded, randomly arranged, single-dose syringes. There were 6907 participants, of whom 6438 were members of the target population (5 to 44 years of age); each was visited every two days. Those with temperatures of 37.8 degrees C or higher for three consecutive days were examined and asked to give blood for culture. Typhoid was diagnosed as either blood culture-positive or clinically suspected on the basis of bradycardia, splenomegaly, and fever, with a negative blood culture. Seventeen months after vaccination, the codes were broken for the 71 patients meeting the criteria for either culture-positive or clinically suspected typhoid. The attack rate of typhoid was 16.2 per 1000 among the controls and 4.1 per 1000 among those immunized with Vi (P less than 0.00001). The efficacy of Vi was 72 percent in the culture-positive cases, 80 percent in the clinically suspected cases, and 75 percent in the two groups combined. These data provide evidence that Vi antibodies confer protection against typhoid. Surveillance continues to determine the duration of Vi-induced immunity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198710293171801

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 387

Metadata

Authors
Acharya, I. L., Lowe, C. U., Thapa, R., Gurubacharya, V. L., Shrestha, M. B., Cadoz, M., Schulz, D., Armand, J., Bryla, D. A., Trollfors, B., Cramton, T., Schneerson, R., & Robbins, J. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1987-10-29
Volume
317
Issue
18
Pages
1101-1104
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2317097995
Cited by
387
References
0
FWCI
32.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198710293171801
The paper
Acharya, I. L., Lowe, C. U., Thapa, R., Gurubacharya, V. L., Shrestha, M. B., Cadoz, M., Schulz, D., Armand, J., Bryla, D. A., Trollfors, B., Cramton, T., Schneerson, R., & Robbins, J. B. (1987). Prevention of Typhoid Fever in Nepal with the VI Capsular Polysaccharide of Salmonella Typhi. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198710293171801

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.