The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ceftazidime Combined with a Short or Long Course of Amikacin for Empirical Therapy of Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Granulocytopenia
Abstract
To determine whether combination antibiotic therapy including a short course of an aminoglycoside was as effective and less toxic than a conventional long course of the combination for the empirical therapy of gram-negative bacteremia in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia, we conducted a randomized multicenter trial comparing ceftazidime plus a short course (three days) of amikacin, ceftazidime plus a long course (nine days) of amikacin, and azlocillin plus a long course (nine days) of amikacin. Single-organism gram-negative bacteremia occurred in 129 of 872 evaluable patients. Without a change in antibiotics, the response rates were 81 percent with ceftazidime and long-course amikacin, 48 percent with ceftazidime and short-course amikacin (P = 0.002), and 40 percent with azlocillin and long-course amikacin (P less than 0.001). Among patients with fewer than 100 granulocytes per cubic millimeter throughout therapy, the response rates were 6 percent with ceftazidime and short-course amikacin and 50 percent with ceftazidime and long-course amikacin (P = 0.03). Linear logistic-regression analysis showed that therapy with ceftazidime and long-course amikacin was the most favorable prognostic factor of the response to infection, whereas the presence of leukemia or shock was the least favorable. We conclude that ceftazidime should be given in combination with a conventional full course of an aminoglycoside (amikacin) when used for the empirical treatment of gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients with granulocytopenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Combination Therapy for Treatment of Infections with Gram-Negative Bacteria
Tamma, P. D., Cosgrove, S. E., & Maragakis, L. L. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05041-11 · Cited by 836
Cometta, A., Calandra, T., Gaya, H., Zinner, S. H., de Bock, R., Del Favero, A., Bucaneve, G., Crokaert, F., Kern, W. V., Klastersky, J., et al. (1996) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.40.5.1108 · Cited by 275
Brunkhorst, F. M. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5833 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- The EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group*
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1987-12-31
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 1692-1698
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2995475181
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ceftazidime Combined with a Short or Long Course of Amikacin for Empirical Therapy of Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Granulocytopenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198712313172703
- The paper
- The EORTC International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group*. (1987). Ceftazidime Combined with a Short or Long Course of Amikacin for Empirical Therapy of Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Cancer Patients with Granulocytopenia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198712313172703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.