Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 563

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

Veronesi, Umberto, Cascinelli, Natale, Adamus, Jerzy, Balch, Charles, Bandiera, Dino, Barchuk, A., Bufalino, Rosaria, Craig, Peter, De Marsillac, Jaime, Durand, J.C., van Geel, A.N., Holmstrom, Hans, Hunter, John A., Jorgensen, Ole G., Kiss, Bela, Kroon, B., Lacour, Jean, Lejeune, Ferdy, MacKie, Rona, Mechl, Zdenek, Mitrov, G., Morabito, Alberto, Nosek, Henryk, Panizzon, R., Prade, M., Santi, Pierluigi, Van Slooten, E., Tomin, Radmilo, Trapeznikov, Nikolaj, Tsanov, Tsanko, Urist, Marshall, Wozniak, K.D.·1988·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Although wide surgical excision is the accepted treatment for thin malignant melanomas, there is reason to believe that narrower margins may be adequate. We conducted a randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of narrow excision (excision with 1-cm margins) for primary melanomas no thicker than 2 mm. Narrow excision was performed in 305 patients, and wide excision (margins of 3 cm or more) was performed in 307 patients. The major prognostic criteria were well balanced in the two groups. The mean thickness of melanomas was 0.99 mm in the narrow-excision group and 1.02 mm in the wide-excision group. The subsequent development of metastatic disease involving regional nodes and distant organs was not different in the two groups (4.6 and 2.3 percent, respectively, in the narrow-excision group, as compared with 6.5 and 2.6 percent in the wide-excision group). Disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates (mean follow-up period, 55 months) were also similar in the two groups. Only three patients had a local recurrence as a first relapse. All had undergone narrow excision, and each had a primary melanoma with a thickness of 1 mm or more. The absence of local recurrence in the group of patients with a primary melanoma thinner than 1 mm and the very low rate of local recurrences indicate that narrow excision is a safe and effective procedure for such patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198805053181804

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 563

Metadata

Authors
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Adamus, J., Balch, C., Bandiera, D., Barchuk, A., Bufalino, R., Craig, P., De Marsillac, J., Durand, J. C., van Geel, A. N., Holmstrom, H., Hunter, J. A., Jorgensen, O. G., Kiss, B., Kroon, B., Lacour, J., Lejeune, F., MacKie, R., Mechl, Z., Mitrov, G., Morabito, A., Nosek, H., Panizzon, R., Prade, M., Santi, P., Van Slooten, E., Tomin, R., Trapeznikov, N., Tsanov, T., Urist, M., & Wozniak, K. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1988-05-05
Volume
318
Issue
18
Pages
1159-1162
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2335085114
Cited by
563
References
0
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198805053181804
The paper
Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Adamus, J., Balch, C., Bandiera, D., Barchuk, A., Bufalino, R., Craig, P., De Marsillac, J., Durand, J. C., van Geel, A. N., Holmstrom, H., Hunter, J. A., Jorgensen, O. G., Kiss, B., Kroon, B., Lacour, J., Lejeune, F., MacKie, R., . . . Wozniak, K. D. (1988). Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198805053181804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.