The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
Abstract
Although wide surgical excision is the accepted treatment for thin malignant melanomas, there is reason to believe that narrower margins may be adequate. We conducted a randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of narrow excision (excision with 1-cm margins) for primary melanomas no thicker than 2 mm. Narrow excision was performed in 305 patients, and wide excision (margins of 3 cm or more) was performed in 307 patients. The major prognostic criteria were well balanced in the two groups. The mean thickness of melanomas was 0.99 mm in the narrow-excision group and 1.02 mm in the wide-excision group. The subsequent development of metastatic disease involving regional nodes and distant organs was not different in the two groups (4.6 and 2.3 percent, respectively, in the narrow-excision group, as compared with 6.5 and 2.6 percent in the wide-excision group). Disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates (mean follow-up period, 55 months) were also similar in the two groups. Only three patients had a local recurrence as a first relapse. All had undergone narrow excision, and each had a primary melanoma with a thickness of 1 mm or more. The absence of local recurrence in the group of patients with a primary melanoma thinner than 1 mm and the very low rate of local recurrences indicate that narrow excision is a safe and effective procedure for such patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma
Bichakjian, C. K., Halpern, A. C., Johnson, T. M., Foote Hood, A., Grichnik, J. M., Swetter, S. M., Tsao, H., Barbosa, V. H., Chuang, T.-Y., Duvic, M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.031 · Cited by 616
Balch, C. M., Soong, S.-J., Smith, T., Ross, M. I., Urist, M. M., Karakousis, C. P., Temple, W. J., Mihm, M. C., Barnhill, R. L., Jewell, W. R., et al. (2001) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10434-001-0101-x · Cited by 406
Self-citationMarsden, J. R., Newton-Bishop, J. A., Burrows, L., Cook, M., Corrie, P. G., Cox, N. H., Gore, M. E., Lorigan, P., MacKie, R., Nathan, P., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09883.x · Cited by 396
Self-citationPennie, M. L., Soon, S. L., Risser, J. B., Veledar, E., Culler, S. D., & Chen, S. C. (2007) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.143.4.488 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Adamus, J., Balch, C., Bandiera, D., Barchuk, A., Bufalino, R., Craig, P., De Marsillac, J., Durand, J. C., van Geel, A. N., Holmstrom, H., Hunter, J. A., Jorgensen, O. G., Kiss, B., Kroon, B., Lacour, J., Lejeune, F., MacKie, R., Mechl, Z., Mitrov, G., Morabito, A., Nosek, H., Panizzon, R., Prade, M., Santi, P., Van Slooten, E., Tomin, R., Trapeznikov, N., Tsanov, T., Urist, M., & Wozniak, K. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1988-05-05
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1159-1162
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2335085114
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198805053181804
- The paper
- Veronesi, U., Cascinelli, N., Adamus, J., Balch, C., Bandiera, D., Barchuk, A., Bufalino, R., Craig, P., De Marsillac, J., Durand, J. C., van Geel, A. N., Holmstrom, H., Hunter, J. A., Jorgensen, O. G., Kiss, B., Kroon, B., Lacour, J., Lejeune, F., MacKie, R., . . . Wozniak, K. D. (1988). Thin Stage I Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198805053181804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.