Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 860

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neu-Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer

van de Vijver, Marc J., Peterse, Johannes L., Mooi, Wolter J., Wisman, Peter, Lomans, Job, Dalesio, Otilia, Nusse, Roel·1988·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Amplification of the neu proto-oncogene in breast cancer has been reported to correlate with the presence of lymph-node metastases and with a poor prognosis. We describe a method for the immunohistochemical detection of overexpression of neu protein on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, with the use of two different monoclonal antibodies. In a group of tumors with a known neu-gene copy number, intense membrane staining of tumor cells was present in all tumors with neu-gene amplification. Of 189 tumors from patients with Stage II breast cancer, 27 (14 percent) had neu-membrane staining. Neu overexpression was associated with larger tumor size (P = 0.006) but not with lymph-node involvement. Neu-protein expression in lymph-node metastases was the same as its expression in primary tumors. Among the patients with neu overexpression (median follow-up, 37 months), disease-free survival was not significantly shorter; overall survival was reduced significantly in these patients (P = 0.042), but this reduction did not remain significant after adjustment for tumor size. Of 45 ductal carcinomas in situ, 19 (42 percent) had neu-membrane staining. These 19 were all of the large-cell, comedo growth type. None of 16 ductal carcinomas in situ of small-cell, papillary, or cribriform growth type had neu overexpression. We conclude that neu overexpression may be an early step in the development of a distinct histologic type of carcinoma of the breast, but we could find no association of overexpression with lymph-node status or tumor recurrence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198811103191902

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 860

Metadata

Authors
van de Vijver, M. J., Peterse, J. L., Mooi, W. J., Wisman, P., Lomans, J., Dalesio, O., & Nusse, R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1988-11-10
Volume
319
Issue
19
Pages
1239-1245
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2323254708
Cited by
860
References
2
FWCI
27.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neu-Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198811103191902
The paper
van de Vijver, M. J., Peterse, J. L., Mooi, W. J., Wisman, P., Lomans, J., Dalesio, O., & Nusse, R. (1988). Neu-Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198811103191902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.