The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nosocomial Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Infection
Abstract
We studied the acquisition and transmission of Clostridium difficile infection prospectively on a general medical ward by serially culturing rectal-swab specimens from 428 patients admitted over an 11-month period. Immunoblot typing was used to differentiate individual strains of C. difficile. Seven percent of the patients (29) had positive cultures at admission. Eighty-three (21 percent) of the 399 patients with negative cultures acquired C. difficile during their hospitalizations. Of these patients, 52 (63 percent) remained asymptomatic and 31 (37 percent) had diarrhea; none had colitis. Patient-to-patient transmission of C. difficile was evidenced by time-space clustering of incident cases with identical immunoblot types and by significantly more frequent and earlier acquisition of C. difficile among patients exposed to roommates with positive cultures. Of the hospital personnel caring for patients with positive cultures, 59 percent (20) had positive cultures for C. difficile from their hands. The hospital rooms occupied by symptomatic patients (49 percent) as well as those occupied by asymptomatic patients (29 percent) were frequently contaminated. Eighty-two percent of the infected cohort still had positive cultures at hospital discharge, and such patients were significantly more likely to be discharged to a long-term care facility. We conclude that nosocomial C. difficile infection, which was associated with diarrhea in about one third of cases, is frequently transmitted among hospitalized patients and that the organism is often present on the hands of hospital personnel caring for such patients. Effective preventive measures are needed to reduce nosocomial acquisition of C. difficile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia
Bartlett, J. G., Chang, T. W., Gurwith, M., Gorbach, S. L., & Onderdonk, A. B. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197803092981003 · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
McDonald, L. C., Gerding, D. N., Johnson, S., Bakken, J. S., Carroll, K. C., Coffin, S. E., Dubberke, E. R., Garey, K. W., Gould, C. V., Kelly, C., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix1085 · Cited by 2,690
Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings
Boyce, J. M., & Pittet, D. (2002) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1067/mic.2002.130391 · Cited by 2,120
Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis
Rupnik, M., Wilcox, M. H., & Gerding, D. N. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2164 · Cited by 1,380
Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe
Kuijper, E. J., Coignard, B., & Tüll, P. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01580.x · Cited by 855
Kyne, L., Warny, M., Qamar, A., & Kelly, C. P. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03592-3 · Cited by 804
Metadata
- Authors
- McFarland, L. V., Mulligan, M. E., Kwok, R. Y. Y., & Stamm, W. E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-01-26
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 204-210
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2328690882
- Cited by
- 1,326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nosocomial Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198901263200402
- The paper
- McFarland, L. V., Mulligan, M. E., Kwok, R. Y. Y., & Stamm, W. E. (1989). Nosocomial Acquisition of Clostridium difficile Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198901263200402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.