The Diagnostic Sensitivity of Electrophysiologic Testing in Patients with Syncope Caused by Transient Bradycardia
Abstract
Although electrophysiologic testing accurately delineates abnormalities in patients with fixed cardiac-conduction defects, its sensitivity in identifying transient rhythm disturbances is unknown. We prospectively studied 21 patients who had electrocardiographically documented intermittent atrioventricular block (n = 13) or sinus pauses (n = 8) causing syncope, but whose cardiac rhythm had reverted to normal by the time of referral. There were 14 men and 7 women, with a mean age (+/- SD) of 63 +/- 13 years. Fourteen patients had organic heart disease, and 8 were taking cardioactive medications. Electrophysiologic testing was performed before the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Only three of the eight patients with documented sinus pauses had abnormalities during their tests that suggested the correct diagnosis (sensitivity, 37.5 percent), including a prolonged sinus-node recovery time in one and carotid-sinus hypersensitivity in two. Three of the eight patients had abnormalities detected that were unrelated to syncope, including atrial flutter, dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Of the 13 patients with documented atrioventricular block, only 2 had abnormalities suggesting the correct diagnosis (sensitivity, 15.4 percent). Additional observations unrelated to syncope among these 13 patients included abnormal sinus-node function, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation causing hypotension. These preliminary observation…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensitivity and specificity of EPS to assess sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disease in patients with syncope are variable, depending on patient selection and pretest probability of a bradycardia substrate.
“The sensitivity and specificity of EPS to assess sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disease in patients with syncope are variable, depending on patient selection and pretest probability of a bradycardia substrate (189–191).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [189]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Fujimura, O., Yee, R., Klein, G. J., Sharma, A. D., & Boahene, K. A.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1989-12-21
- Volume
- 321
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 1703-1707
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2340396220
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- syncope, transient bradycardia, electrophysiologic testing, diagnostic sensitivity, sinus pause, sinus node recovery time, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, ventricular tachycardia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bradycardia, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Block, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Syncope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review