Cited by 158Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The Diagnostic Sensitivity of Electrophysiologic Testing in Patients with Syncope Caused by Transient Bradycardia

Fujimura, Osamu, Yee, Raymond, Klein, George J., Sharma, Arjun D., Boahene, K. Atta·1989·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Although electrophysiologic testing accurately delineates abnormalities in patients with fixed cardiac-conduction defects, its sensitivity in identifying transient rhythm disturbances is unknown. We prospectively studied 21 patients who had electrocardiographically documented intermittent atrioventricular block (n = 13) or sinus pauses (n = 8) causing syncope, but whose cardiac rhythm had reverted to normal by the time of referral. There were 14 men and 7 women, with a mean age (+/- SD) of 63 +/- 13 years. Fourteen patients had organic heart disease, and 8 were taking cardioactive medications. Electrophysiologic testing was performed before the implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Only three of the eight patients with documented sinus pauses had abnormalities during their tests that suggested the correct diagnosis (sensitivity, 37.5 percent), including a prolonged sinus-node recovery time in one and carotid-sinus hypersensitivity in two. Three of the eight patients had abnormalities detected that were unrelated to syncope, including atrial flutter, dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Of the 13 patients with documented atrioventricular block, only 2 had abnormalities suggesting the correct diagnosis (sensitivity, 15.4 percent). Additional observations unrelated to syncope among these 13 patients included abnormal sinus-node function, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation causing hypotension. These preliminary observation…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198912213212503

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity and specificity of EPS to assess sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disease in patients with syncope are variable, depending on patient selection and pretest probability of a bradycardia substrate.

    “The sensitivity and specificity of EPS to assess sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disease in patients with syncope are variable, depending on patient selection and pretest probability of a bradycardia substrate (189–191).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 22 · Cited by 158

Authors
Fujimura, O., Yee, R., Klein, G. J., Sharma, A. D., & Boahene, K. A.
Affiliations
University Hospital (CA)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1989-12-21
Volume
321
Issue
25
Pages
1703-1707
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2340396220
Cited by
158
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
syncope, transient bradycardia, electrophysiologic testing, diagnostic sensitivity, sinus pause, sinus node recovery time, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, dual atrioventricular nodal pathways, ventricular tachycardia
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bradycardia, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Block, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review