Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage and Infection in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Open access
Luzar, Mary Anne, Coles, Gerald A., Faller, Bernadette, Slingeneyer, Alain, Dah, George Dah, Briat, Claude, Wone, Christian, Knefati, Yehya, Kessler, Michelle, Peluso, Francesco·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We studied 140 consecutive patients beginning continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) at one of seven hospitals to assess the relation of the nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus to subsequent catheter-exit-site infection or peritonitis. Shortly before the implantation of the catheters, the patients' anterior nares were cultured for the presence of S. aureus. Antibiotics were not prescribed for the S. aureus carriers, but all the patients were monitored for signs of catheter infection (median follow-up, 10.4 months). At the initiation of CAPD, 63 patients (45 percent) carried S. aureus in the nares. Nasal carriage was more frequent among the 30 patients with diabetes (77 percent) than among the 110 without the disease (36 percent). The carriers of S. aureus had a significantly higher rate of exit-site infection than the noncarriers (0.40 vs. 0.10 episode per year; P = 0.012). Of these episodes, 24 of 34 were caused by S. aureus. The rates of peritonitis of all bacterial types did not differ significantly between the groups, but all 11 episodes of peritonitis caused by S. aureus occurred among the carriers. In 85 percent of the patients with clinical S. aureus infections, the strain from the nares and the strain causing the infection were similar in phage type and antibiotic profile. We conclude that in patients beginning ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, the nasal carriage of S. aureus is associated with an increased risk of catheter-exit-site infection and that the performance of nasal cultures before the implantation of the catheter can identify patients at high risk of subsequent morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199002223220804

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Luzar, M. A., Coles, G. A., Faller, B., Slingeneyer, A., Dah, G. D., Briat, C., Wone, C., Knefati, Y., Kessler, M., & Peluso, F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-02-22
Volume
322
Issue
8
Pages
505-509
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2023111331
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage and Infection in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199002223220804
The paper
Luzar, M. A., Coles, G. A., Faller, B., Slingeneyer, A., Dah, G. D., Briat, C., Wone, C., Knefati, Y., Kessler, M., & Peluso, F. (1990). Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage and Infection in Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199002223220804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.