Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,153

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy plus High-Dose Radiation versus Radiation Alone in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Dillman, Robert O., Seagren, Stephen L., Propert, Kathleen J., Guerra, Julio, Eaton, Walter L., Perry, Michael C., Carey, Robert W., Frei, Emil F., Green, Mark R.·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with locally or regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer radiation is the standard treatment, but survival remains poor. We therefore conducted a randomized trial to determine whether induction chemotherapy before irradiation improves survival. METHODS: All the patients had documented non-small-cell cancer of the lung with Stage III disease established by clinical or surgical staging. Eligibility requirements included excellent performance status, minimal weight loss, and visible disease on radiography. Patients randomly assigned to group 1 received cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area given intravenously on days 1 and 29) and vinblastine (5 mg per square meter given intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29) and then began radiation therapy on day 50 (60 Gy over a 6-week period). Patients assigned to group 2 received the same radiation therapy but began it immediately and received no chemotherapy. RESULTS: The eligible patients in group 1 (n = 78) and group 2 (n = 77) were comparable in terms of age (median, 60 years), sex, performance status, histologic features, stage of disease, and completeness of radiation therapy. The median survival was greater for those in group 1-13.8 versus 9.7 months (P = 0.0066 by log-rank test). Rates of survival in group 1 were 55 percent after one year, 26 percent after two years, and 23 percent after three years, as compared with 40, 13, and 11 percent, respectively, in group 2. Those in group 1 had a higher incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization (7 percent, vs. 3 percent in group 2) and severe weight loss (14 percent vs. 6 percent), but there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine before radiation significantly improves median survival (by about four months) and doubles the number of long-term survivors, as compared with radiation therapy alone. Since three quarters of the patients still die within three years, however, further improvements in systemic and local therapy are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199010043231403

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,153

Metadata

Authors
Dillman, R. O., Seagren, S. L., Propert, K. J., Guerra, J., Eaton, W. L., Perry, M. C., Carey, R. W., Frei, E. F., & Green, M. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-10-04
Volume
323
Issue
14
Pages
940-945
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2317448174
Cited by
1,153
References
2
FWCI
59.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy plus High-Dose Radiation versus Radiation Alone in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199010043231403
The paper
Dillman, R. O., Seagren, S. L., Propert, K. J., Guerra, J., Eaton, W. L., Perry, M. C., Carey, R. W., Frei, E. F., & Green, M. R. (1990). A Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy plus High-Dose Radiation versus Radiation Alone in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199010043231403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.