Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 732

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Angiographic Follow-up after Placement of a Self-Expanding Coronary-Artery Stent

Open access
Serruys, Patrick W., Strauss, Bradley H., Beatt, Kevin J., Bertrand, Michel E., Puel, Jacques, Rickards, Anthony F., Meier, Bernhard, Goy, Jean-Jacques, Vogt, Pierre, Kappenberger, Lukas, Sigwart, Ulrich·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The placement of stents in coronary arteries after coronary angioplasty has been investigated as a way of treating abrupt coronary-artery occlusion related to the angioplasty and of reducing the late intimal hyperplasia responsible for gradual restenosis of the dilated lesion. METHODS: From March 1986 to January 1988, we implanted 117 self-expanding, stainless-steel endovascular stents (Wallstent) in the native coronary arteries (94 stents) or saphenous-vein bypass grafts (23 stents) of 105 patients. Angiograms were obtained immediately before and after placement of the stent and at follow-up at least one month later (unless symptoms required angiography sooner). The mortality after one year was 7.6 percent (8 patients). Follow-up angiograms (after a mean [+/- SD] of 5.7 +/- 4.4 months) were obtained in 95 patients with 105 stents and were analyzed quantitatively by a computer-assisted system of cardiovascular angiographic analysis. The 10 patients without follow-up angiograms included 4 who died. RESULTS: Complete occlusion occurred in 27 stents in 25 patients (24 percent); 21 occlusions were documented within the first 14 days after implantation. Overall, immediately after placement of the stent there was a significant increase in the minimal luminal diameter and a significant decrease in the percentage of the diameter with stenosis (changing from a mean [+/- SD] of 1.88 +/- 0.43 to 2.48 +/- 0.51 mm and from 37 +/- 12 to 21 +/- 10 percent, respectively; P less than 0.0001). Later, however, there was a significant decrease in the minimal luminal diameter and a significant increase in the stenosis of the segment with the stent (1.68 +/- 1.78 mm and 48 +/- 34 percent at follow-up). Significant restenosis, as indicated by a reduction of 0.72 mm in the minimal luminal diameter or by an increase in the percentage of stenosis to greater than or equal to 50 percent, occurred in 32 percent and 14 percent of patent stents, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early occlusion remains an important limitation of this coronary-artery stent. Even when the early effects are beneficial, there are frequently late occlusions or restenosis. The place of this form of treatment for coronary artery disease remains to be determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199101033240103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 732

Metadata

Authors
Serruys, P. W., Strauss, B. H., Beatt, K. J., Bertrand, M. E., Puel, J., Rickards, A. F., Meier, B., Goy, J.-J., Vogt, P., Kappenberger, L., & Sigwart, U.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-01-03
Volume
324
Issue
1
Pages
13-17
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338633505
Cited by
732
References
0
FWCI
83.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Angiographic Follow-up after Placement of a Self-Expanding Coronary-Artery Stent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199101033240103
The paper
Serruys, P. W., Strauss, B. H., Beatt, K. J., Bertrand, M. E., Puel, J., Rickards, A. F., Meier, B., Goy, J.-J., Vogt, P., Kappenberger, L., & Sigwart, U. (1991). Angiographic Follow-up after Placement of a Self-Expanding Coronary-Artery Stent. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199101033240103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.