Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Therapy with Fluconazole after Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Bozzette, Samuel A., Larsen, Robert A., Chiu, Joseph, Leal, Mary Ann E., Jacobsen, Jan, Rothman, Paul, Robinson, Patrick, Gilbert, Gene, McCutchan, J. Allen, Tilles, Jeremiah, Leedom, John M., Richman, Douglas D.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the rate of relapse after primary treatment for cryptococcal meningitis remains high. We conducted a controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of maintenance therapy with fluconazole. At entry into the study, all participants had sterile cultures of cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and urine after following a standardized course of therapy for culture-proved cryptococcal meningitis. The patients were randomly assigned to take either fluconazole or placebo as maintenance therapy. The dose of fluconazole was 100 mg daily in the first phase of study and 200 mg daily in the second phase. RESULTS: Of 84 patients initially enrolled, 16 (19 percent) were found to have silent, persistent infection on the basis of cultures that became positive after entry into the study; 7 other patients were lost to follow-up shortly after entry. Of the remaining 61 patients, 10 of 27 assigned to placebo (37 percent) and 1 of 34 assigned to fluconazole (3 percent) had a recurrence of cryptococcal infection at any site (difference in risk, 34 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 53). Of the 11 recurrent infections, 7 were detected in urine obtained after prostatic massage. There were four recurrent meningeal infections in the patients taking placebo, but none in those taking fluconazole (mean duration of follow-up, 164 days) (P = 0.03). In multivariate analyses, the best predictors of recurrence-free survival were fluconazole treatment (P = 0.02; relative hazard, 13.2), a lower serum cryptococcal-antigen titer (P = 0.05; relative hazard, 1.2), and more prolonged primary therapy with flucytosine (P = 0.09; relative hazard, 1.1). Survival and toxicity were similar in the two maintenance-treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AIDS, silent persistent infection is common after clinically successful treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. Maintenance therapy with fluconazole is highly effective in preventing recurrent cryptococcal infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199102283240902

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Bozzette, S. A., Larsen, R. A., Chiu, J., Leal, M. A. E., Jacobsen, J., Rothman, P., Robinson, P., Gilbert, G., McCutchan, J. A., Tilles, J., Leedom, J. M., & Richman, D. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-02-28
Volume
324
Issue
9
Pages
580-584
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2312660835
Cited by
301
References
0
FWCI
26.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Therapy with Fluconazole after Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199102283240902
The paper
Bozzette, S. A., Larsen, R. A., Chiu, J., Leal, M. A. E., Jacobsen, J., Rothman, P., Robinson, P., Gilbert, G., McCutchan, J. A., Tilles, J., Leedom, J. M., & Richman, D. D. (1991). A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Therapy with Fluconazole after Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199102283240902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.